问题
I have a long running process in an mvvmcross viewmodel and wish to make it async (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/hh191443.aspx).
The async keyword is currently supported in the beta channel for Xamarin.
Below is an example of how I'm currently implementing async. The IsBusy flag ccould be bound to a UI element and display a loading message.
Is this the correct way?
public class MyModel: MvxViewModel
{
private readonly IMyService _myService;
private bool _isBusy;
public bool IsBusy
{
get { return _isBusy; }
set { _isBusy = value; RaisePropertyChanged(() => IsBusy); ; }
}
public ICommand MyCommand
{
get
{
return new MvxCommand(DoMyCommand);
}
}
public MyModel(IMyService myService)
{
_myService = myService;
}
public async void DoMyCommand()
{
IsBusy = true;
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
_myService.LongRunningProcess();
});
IsBusy = false;
}
}
回答1:
You should avoid async void
. When you're dealing with ICommand
, you do need to use async void
, but its scope should be minimized.
This modified code exposes your action as an async Task
, which is unit testable and consumable from other parts of your code:
public class MyModel: MvxViewModel
{
private readonly IMyService _myService;
private bool _isBusy;
public bool IsBusy
{
get { return _isBusy; }
set { _isBusy = value; RaisePropertyChanged(() => IsBusy); ; }
}
public ICommand MyCommand
{
get
{
return new MvxCommand(async () => await DoMyCommand());
}
}
public MyModel(IMyService myService)
{
_myService = myService;
}
public async Task DoMyCommand()
{
IsBusy = true;
await Task.Run(() =>
{
_myService.LongRunningProcess();
});
IsBusy = false;
}
}
Your use of IsBusy
is fine; that's one common approach in asynchronous UIs.
I did change Task.Factory.StartNew
to Task.Run
; Task.Run
is preferred in async
code for reasons described by Stephen Toub.
回答2:
MvvmCross now has MvxAsyncCommand
(see GitHub commit).
So instead of doing this
public ICommand MyCommand
{
get
{
return new MvxCommand(async () => await DoMyCommand());
}
}
You can do this
public ICommand MyCommand
{
get
{
return new MvxAsyncCommand(DoMyCommand);
}
}
回答3:
Looks OK except I would add a try catch finally around that await.
public async void DoMyCommand()
{
IsBusy = true;
try{
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
_myService.LongRunningProcess();
});
}catch{
//Log Exception
}finally{
IsBusy = false;
}
}
Further more I have an example on my blog using an MvxCommand with async. Very similar to your example http://deapsquatter.blogspot.com/2013/03/updating-my-mobile-apps-for-async.html
回答4:
You can also use MethodBinding plugin to avoid boiler plate code (commands), and bind your UI directly to the async method.
Besides, if you use Fody PropertyChanged, your code would look like this:
[ImplementPropertyChanged]
public class MyModel: MvxViewModel
{
private readonly IMyService _myService;
public bool IsBusy { get; set; }
public MyModel(IMyService myService)
{
_myService = myService;
}
public async Task DoSomething()
{
IsBusy = true;
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
_myService.LongRunningProcess();
});
IsBusy = false;
}
}
You can make the binding like: "Click DoSomething".
On the other hand, rather than using await Task.Factory.StartNew()
, why not making _myService.LongRunningProcess
async?
It would look much better:
public async Task DoSomething()
{
IsBusy = true;
await _myService.LongRunningProcess();
IsBusy = false;
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17187113/how-can-i-use-async-in-an-mvvmcross-view-model