问题
I have the long
value bits
declared like so:
long bits = len*8L;
(304)
System.out.println(bits);
This outputs as 304
If I use the long name bits like so I get 0 & 0 respectively.
System.out.println(bits>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8)));
If I use the actual number, like so, I get 304 and 48 respectively
System.out.println(304>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304>>(4*8)));
I'm trying to convert this Java to JavaScript but JavaScript gives me 304 and 48 in all scenarios. I need it to match the Java and give values of 0 & 0.
Any ideas?
EDIT
Follow up, just to be clear, I need the JavaScript equivalent to equal 0, mimicking how the Java currently does it (the two examples above that equal 0 won't be changed in what we're developing).
So console.log(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8))) should equal 0, it currently equates to 48
回答1:
The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.
If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is
int
, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value0x1f
(0b11111
). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range0
to31
, inclusive.
For an int
value such as 304
, the bit shift value of 4*8
, or 32, is really 0
, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF
yields 48
.
If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is
long
, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value0x3f
(0b111111
). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range0
to63
, inclusive.
For a long
value, the bit shift value of 4*8
really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0
.
This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.
Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.
It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int
. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.
console.log(304>>32); // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33
回答2:
If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L
, like this:
System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));
The reason is that you cannot shift an int
with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int
is only 32 bits long.
Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >>
operator; it treats every number that you pass to >>
as a 32-bit integer.
You could write your own function that does something similar:
function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}
console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53291811/java-hex-calculation