问题
I have a directive that transcludes the original content, parses it, and uses the information in the original content to help build the new content. The gist of it looks like this:
.directive('list', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
templateUrl: '...',
scope: true,
controller: function($scope, $element, $attrs, $transclude) {
var items;
$transclude(function(clone) {
clone = Array.prototype.slice.call(clone);
items = clone
.filter(function(node) {
return node.nodeType === 1;
})
.map(function(node) {
return {
value: node.getAttribute('value')
text: node.innerHTML
};
});
});
// Do some stuff down here with the item information
}
}
});
Then, I use it like this:
<list>
<item value="foo">bar</item>
<item value="baz">qux</item>
</list>
This all works fine like this. The problem occurs when I try to use an ng-repeat
inside the directive content, like this:
<list>
<item ng-repeat="item in items" value="{{ item.value }}">{{ item.text }}</item>
</list>
When I try to do this, there are no items. Anyone know why this wouldn't work, or if there is a better way of accomplishing the same kind of thing?
回答1:
You may try:
transcludeFn(scope, function (clone) {
iElem.append(clone);
})
For bit more details:
HTML:
<foo data-lists='[lists data here]'>
<li ng-repeat="list in lists">{{list.name}}</li>
</foo>
Directive:
var Foo = function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '...'
transclude: true,
scope: { lists: '=?' }
link: function(scope, iElem, iAttrs, Ctrl, transcludeFn) {
transcludeFn(scope, function (clone) {
iElem.append(clone);
}
}
};
};
.directive('foo', Foo);
You should let transcludFn know which scope you are going to use within transcludeFn. And if you don't want to use isolate scope, you may also try transcludeFn(scope.$parent....)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25641618/angularjs-transclude-ng-repeat-inside-directive