问题
I am trying to make a particle system where instead of a texture, a quad is rendered by a fragment shader such as below.
uniform vec3 color;
uniform float radius;
uniform float edge;
uniform vec2 position;
uniform float alpha;
void main()
{
float dist = distance(gl_FragCoord.xy, position);
float intensity = smoothstep(dist-edge, dist+edge, radius);
gl_FragColor = vec4(color, intensity*alpha);
}
Each particle is an object of a c++ class that wraps this shader and all the variables together and draws it. I use openFrameworks so the exact openGL calls are hidden from me.
I've read that usually particle systems are done with textures, however, I prefer to do it like this because this way I can add more functionality to the particles. The problem is that after only 30 particles, the framerate drops dramatically. Is there a more efficient way of doing this? I was thinking of maybe putting the variables for each particle into an array and sending these arrays into one fragment shader that then renders all particles in one go. But this would mean that the amount of particles would be fixed because the uniform arrays in the shader would have to be declared beforehand.
Are non-texture-based particle systems simply too inefficient to be realistic, or is there a way of designing this that I'm overlooking?
回答1:
The reason textures are used is because you can move the particles using the GPU, which is very fast. You'd double buffer a texture which stores particle attributes (like position) per texel, and ping-pong data between them, using a framebuffer object to draw to them and the fragment shader to do the computation, rendering a full screen polygon. Then you'd draw an array of quads and read the texture to get the positions.
Instead of a texture storing attributes you could pack them directly into your VBO data. This gets complicated because you have multiple vertices per particle, but can still be done a number of ways. glVertexBindingDivisor (requires instancing), drawing points, or using the geometry shader come to mind. Transform feedback or image_load_store could be used to update VBOs with the GPU instead of textures.
If you move particles with the CPU, you also need to copy the data to the GPU every frame. This is quite slow, but nothing like 30 particles being a problem slow. This is probably to do with the number of draw calls. Each time you draw something there's a tonne of stuff GL does to set up the operation. Setting uniform values per-primitive (nearly) is very expensive for the same reason. Particles work well if you have arrays of data that gets processed by a manager all at once. They parallelize very well in such cases. Generally their computation is cheap and it all comes down to minimizing memory and keeping good locality.
If you want to keep particle updating CPU side, I'd go with this:
- Create a VBO full of -1 to 1 quads (two triangles, 6 verts) and element array buffer to draw them. This buffer will remain static in GPU memory and is what you use to draw the particles all at once with a single draw call.
- Create a texture (could be 1D) or VBO (if you choose one of the above methods) that contains positions and particle attributes that update pretty much every frame (using
glTexImage1D/glBufferData/glMapBuffer). - Create another texture with particle attributes that rarely update (e.g. only when you spawn them). You can send updates with
glTexSubImage1D/glBufferSubData/glMapBufferRange.
When you draw the particles, read position and other attributes from the texture (or attributes if you used VBOs) and use the -1 to 1 quads in the main geometry VBO as offsets to your position.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25855434/efficiently-making-a-particle-system-without-textures