问题
I have two tables customer_details
and address_details
. I want to display customer details with their corresponding address, so I was using a LEFT JOIN
, but when I'm executing this query, SQL Server drops rows where street_no
of customer_details table doesn't match with the street_no in address_detials table and displays only rows where `street_no' of customer_detials = street_no of address_details table. I need to display a complete customer_details table and in case if street_no doesn't matches it should display empty string or anything. Am I doing anything wrong in my SQL join?
Table customer_details
:
case_id customer_name mob_no street_no
-------------------------------------------------
1 John 242342343 4324234234234
1 Rohan 343233333 43332
1 Ankit 234234233 2342332423433
1 Suresh 234234324 2342342342342
1 Ranjeet 343424323 32233
1 Ramu 234234333 2342342342343
Table address_details
:
s_no streen_no address city case_id
------------------------------------------------------
1 4324234234234 Roni road Delhi 1
2 2342332423433 Natan street Lucknow 1
3 2342342342342 Koliko road Herdoi 1
SQL JOIN query:
select
a.*, b.address
from
customer_details a
left join
address_details b on a.street_no = b.street_no
where
b.case_id = 1
回答1:
Now that it became clear that you used b.case_id=1
, I will explain why it filters:
The LEFT JOIN itself returns some rows that contain all NULL values for table b
in the result set, which is what you want and expect.
But by using WHERE b.case_id=1
, the rows containing NULL values for table b
are filtered out because none of them matches the condition (all those rows have b.case_id=NULL
so they don't match).
It might work to instead use WHERE a.case_id=1
, but we don't know if a.case_id
and b.case_id
are always the same value for matching rows (they might not be; and if they are always the same, then we just identified a potential redundancy).
There are two ways to fix this for sure.
(1) Move b.case_id = 1
into the left join condition:
left join address_details b on a.street_no = b.street_no and b.case_id = 1
(2) Keep b.case_id = 1
in the WHERE but also allow for NULLED-out b
values:
left join address_details b on a.street_no = b.street_no
where b.case_id = 1
or b.street_no IS NULL
Personally I'd go for (1) because that is the most clear way to express that you want to filter b
on two conditions, without affecting the rows of a
that are being returned.
回答2:
I do think that Wilhelm Poggenpohl answer is kind of right. You just need to change the last join condition a.case_id=1 to b.case_id=1
select a.* , b.address
from customer_details a
left join address_details b on a.street_no=b.street_no
and b.case_id=1
This query will show every row from customer_details
and the corresponding adress if there is a match of street_no
and the adress meets the condition case_id=1
.
回答3:
This is because of the where clause. Try this:
select a.* , b.address
from customer_details a
left join address_details b on a.street_no=b.street_no
and a.case_id=1
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52206622/join-query-sql-server-is-dropping-some-rows-of-my-first-table