问题
In C++14, since constexpr
are not implicitly const
anymore, can a constexpr
member function modify a data member of a class:
struct myclass
{
int member;
constexpr myclass(int input): member(input) {}
constexpr void f() {member = 42;} // Is it allowed?
};
回答1:
Yes they are, I believe this change started with proposal N3598: constexpr member functions and implicit const and eventually became part of N3652: Relaxing constraints on constexpr functions which changed section 7.1.5
paragraph 3
what is allowed in the function body from a white-list:
its function-body shall be = delete, = default, or a compound-statement that contains only
- null statements,
- static_assert-declarations
- typedef declarations and alias-declarations that do not define classes or enumerations,
- using-declarations,
- using-directives,
- and exactly one return statement;
to a black-list:
its function-body shall be = delete, = default, or a compound-statement that does not contain
- an asm-definition,
- a goto statement,
- a try-block, or
- a definition of a variable of non-literal type or of static or thread storage duration or for which no initialization is performed.
and also added the following notes to section C.3.3
Clause 7: declarations:
Change: constexpr non-static member functions are not implicitly const member functions.
Rationale: Necessary to allow constexpr member functions to mutate the object.
Effect on original feature: Valid C++ 2011 code may fail to compile in this International Standard. For example, the following code is valid in C++ 2011 but invalid in this International Standard because it declares the same member function twice with different return types:
struct S { constexpr const int &f(); int &f(); };
回答2:
As far as I can tell, yes. The restrictions are, from [dcl.constexpr]:
The definition of a
constexpr
function shall satisfy the following constraints:
— it shall not be virtual (10.3);
— its return type shall be a literal type;
— each of its parameter types shall be a literal type;
— its function-body shall be= delete
,= default
, or a compound-statement that does not contain
- an asm-definition,
- a
goto
statement,- a try-block, or
- a definition of a variable of non-literal type or of static or thread storage duration or for which no initialization is performed.
The function meets all those requirements.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32699007/in-c14-can-a-constexpr-member-change-a-data-member