问题
I visited http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html after talking with a peer regarding N+1 and the serious performance implications of bad DB queries.
ActiveRecord (Rails):
clients = Client.includes(:address).limit(10)
Where client's have addresses, and I intend to access them while looping through the clients, Rails provides includes
to let it know to go ahead and add them to the query, which eliminates 9 queries right off the bat.
Django:
https://github.com/lilspikey/django-batch-select provides batch query support. Do you know of other libraries or tricks to achieve what Rails provides above, but in a less verbose manor (as in the rails example wherein just 19 chars fix N+1 and is very clear)? Also, does batch-select address the concern in the same way, or are these two different things?
BTW, I'm not asking about select_related
, though it may seem to be the answer at first glance. I'm speaking of a situation where address
has a forign key to client
.
回答1:
You can do it with prefetch_related since Django 1.4: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/querysets/#prefetch-related
If you're using < 1.4, have a look at this module: https://github.com/ionelmc/django-prefetch
It claims to be more flexible than Django's prefetch_related. Verbose but works great.
回答2:
Unfortunately, Django's ORM as of yet has no way of doing this.
Fortunately, it is possible to do it in only 2 queries, with a bit of work done in Python.
clients = list(Client.objects.all()[:10])
addresses = dict((x.client_id, x) for x in
Address.objects.filter(client__in=clients))
for client in clients:
print client, addresses[client.id]
回答3:
django-batch-select is supposed to provide an answer to this problem, though I haven't tried it out. Ignacio's answer above seems best to me.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5422189/django-n1-query-solution