问题
I'm aware that the OverloadedStrings
language pragma wraps an implicit fromString
around all string literals. What I'd like to do is not actually overload strings, but merely change their meaning so that they are always turned into Text
, and therefore, using a string literal as a list of characters should result in a type error.
It appears to be impossible to import the IsString
class without also importing the String
instance for that class. Does ghc provide some way for me to restrict string literals to Text
only?
回答1:
It's a little bit of overkill, but one solution is to combine OverloadedStrings and RebindableSyntax. The RebindableSyntax
extension causes all the implicit function calls that Haskell syntax uses to refer to whatever functions are in scope; for instance, integer literals use any fromIntegral
, not necessarily Prelude.fromIntegral
. As a side effect, Prelude
is no longer implicitly imported, so you have to do that manually. As long as you do import it, there shouldn't be any issues with syntax using the wrong function implicitly (I think—I haven't actually used this technique). When combined with OverloadedStrings
, this causes "foo"
to be transformed into fromString "foo"
for whatever fromString
's in scope, not necessarily Data.String.fromString "foo"
. So making fromString
synonymous with pack
will do what you want. A complete example:
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings, RebindableSyntax #-}
import Prelude
import qualified Data.Text as T
import qualified Data.Text.IO as T
fromString :: String -> T.Text
fromString = T.pack
main :: IO ()
main = T.putStrLn "Hello, world!"
This works fine, and changing main
to main = putStrLn "Hello, world!"
produces the desired error:
TestStrings.hs:11:17:
Couldn't match expected type `String' with actual type `T.Text'
Expected type: [Char] -> String
Actual type: String -> T.Text
In the first argument of `putStrLn', namely `"Hello, world!"'
In the expression: putStrLn "Hello, world!"
Commenting out the definition of fromString
causes a different error:
TestStrings.hs:11:19:
Not in scope: `fromString'
Perhaps you meant `showString' (imported from Prelude)
If you want it to work with both strict and lazy text, you could define your own IsString
type class, and make both of them instances; the class doesn't have to be called IsString
, just so long as it has a fromString
method.
Also, a word of warning: the section of the GHC manual on RebindableSyntax
doesn't mention the fromString
function, and the section on OverloadedStrings
doesn't mention RebindableSyntax
. There's no reason this shouldn't work, but I think that means that this solution technically relies on undocumented behavior.
回答2:
Not a way to achieve this now, but maybe eventually, is the instance force
as proposed in a GHC feature proposal under discussion, where you’d say
instance force IsString Text
in your module. This is one of the main motivating examples for the proposal.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11552764/restricting-string-literals-to-text-only