com.something.SuperClass:
@Entity
@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)
public abstract class SuperClass implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -695503064509648117L;
long confirmationCode;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO) // Causes exception!!!
public long getConfirmationCode() {
return confirmationCode;
}
public void setConfirmationCode(long confirmationCode) {
this.confirmationCode = confirmationCode;
}
}
com.something.SubClass:
@Entity
public abstract class Subclass extends SuperClass {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 8623159397061057722L;
String name;
@Column(nullable = false)
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
Gives me this exception:
Caused by: org.hibernate.MappingException: Cannot use identity column key
generation with <union-subclass> mapping for: com.something.SuperClass
What's the best and most convenient way for me to generate the ID's? I do not want to change my inheritance strategy.
The problem here is that you mix "table-per-class" inheritance and GenerationType.Auto
.
Consider an identity column in MsSQL. It is column based. In a "table-per-class" strategy you use one table per class and each one has an ID.
Try:
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE)
I wonder if this is a database dialect specific problem, since watching a youtube tutorial with PostgreSQL as the underlying database I saw that the creator of the video run succefully an app with the default @GeneratedValue. In my case (the underlying database is MySQL) I had to modify the @GeneratedValue strategy to GenerationType.TABLE exactly as zoidbeck proposes.
Here is the video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIdM4KQOtH8
In our case, we use a PostreSQL database for dev and production and an in-memory hsqldb database for tests. We are using a sequence in both cases to generate an id. Apparently GenerationType.AUTO
defaults to SEQUENCE
for postgres, but failed in our local tests (must default to something else for hsqldb).
So the solution that worked for us, explicitly use GenerationType.SEQUENCE
.
Agree with zoidbeck's answer. You need to change strategy to:
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE)
But that's not all, you need to create a new table, what will hold your abstract's table primary key sequence. Modify your mapping to
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE, generator = "ConfirmationCodeGenerator")
@TableGenerator(table = "SEQUENCES", name = "ConfirmationCodeGenerator")
public long getConfirmationCode() {
return confirmationCode;
}
And a new table in database should look like following:
When you ran your application, Hibernate will insert a row where sequence_name
will be the entity name (SuperClass
in this example) and sequence_next_hi_value
value will be automatically incremented and used for new records of all implementing subclasses's tables.
you can use @MappedSuperclass for inheritance
There is a SQL standard Compliance in between MySQL and PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL Postgres understands a good subset of SQL92/99 plus some object-oriented features to these subsets. Postgres is capable of handling complex routines and rules as declarative SQL queries, subqueries, views, multi-user support, transactions, query optimization, inheritance, and arrays. Does not support selecting data across different databases.
MySQL MySQL uses SQL92 as its foundation. Runs on countless platforms. Mysql can construct queries that can join tables from different databases. Supports both left and right outer joins using both ANSI and ODBC syntax. As of MySQL 4.1 from that release on, MySQL will handle subqueries. Views supported as of release 5.
For a detailed description please visit. http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/freeware/pgsql-vs-mysql.html
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/916169/cannot-use-identity-column-key-generation-with-union-subclass-table-per-clas