Portable C SWAP macro which doesn't require a 'type' argument and doesn't use memcpy

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-12-30 12:57:07

问题


Swap macro's which take a type are fairly well known.

#define SWAP(type, a_, b_) do {        \
    type SWAP, *a = &(a_), *b = &(b_); \
    SWAP = *a;                         \
    *a = *b;                           \
    *b = SWAP;                         \
} while (0)

also: Macro SWAP(t,x,y) exchanging two arguments of type t

Is it possible to implement this functionality while being...

  • portable (no compiler specific typeof)
  • without using function calls such as memcpy
    (which isn't assured to get optimized out, it wasn't in my tests at least)

I came up with a flawed method which uses a struct, defined to be the size of the input.

#define SWAP(a_, b_) do \
{ \
    struct { \
        char dummy_data[sizeof(a_)]; \
    } SWAP, *a = (void *)(&(a_)), *b = (void *)(&(b_)); \
    /* ensure sizes match */ \
    { char t[(sizeof(a_) == sizeof(*a)) ? 1 : -1]; (void)t; } \
    /* check types are compatible */ \
    (void)(0 ? (&(a_) == &(b_)) : 0); \
    SWAP = *a; \
    *a = *b; \
    *b = SWAP; \
} while (0)

... but it can fail if the temporary struct gets padded by the compiler (Depending on GCC's __packed__ would work but then its no longer portable)
It also may have issue with alignment depending on the architecture
.


回答1:


I am curious to know under which circumstances such a structure would get padded, and whether such padding would be conformant.

You can add a static check for sizeof(SWAP) == sizeof(a_) and use memcpy if the test fails (padding was inserted at the end of the SWAP structure).

Also do not use simple names such as a and b in the body of the macro as they could be macro expanded if the user defined these identifiers as macros. Using a and b as macro arguments does not pose a problem.

#define SWAP(a, b) do {                             \
    struct {                                        \
        char a_[sizeof(a)];                         \
    } SWAP, *a_ = (void *)&(a), *b_ = (void *)&(b); \
        if (sizeof(SWAP) == sizeof(a)) {            \
            SWAP = *a_; *a_ = *b_; *b_ = SWAP;      \
        } else if (a_ != b_) {                      \
            memcpy(&SWAP, a_, sizeof(a));           \
            memcpy(a_, b_, sizeof(a));              \
            memcpy(b_, &SWAP, sizeof(a));           \
        }                                           \
    } while (0)

You might want to add a check for sizeof(a) == sizeof(b) as a poor mans attempt to type checking this overworked macro.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29192256/portable-c-swap-macro-which-doesnt-require-a-type-argument-and-doesnt-use-me

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!