问题
I'm building a Smalltalk API to an XML-based web service. The XML service is so regular that, rather than write the methods by hand, I figured I'd just override #doesNotUnderstand:
to dynamically add methods via MyApi class>>compile:
, then call all the methods once in a workspace, then remove the DNU and have my nice API.
This works great, but passing a giant string to #compile:
just feels really wrong to me; in Python and other languages, I'd be able to attach a nicely syntax-checked lambda to a class to achieve a similar effect in a safer manner. E.g.:
def himaker(name):
def hello(self, times):
for x in xrange(times):
print "Hi, %s!" % name
return hello
class C(object): pass
C.bob = himaker('Bob')
C.jerry = himaker('Jerry')
a = C()
a.bob(5)
versus
SomeObject>>addHello: name
| source methodName |
methodName := 'sayHello', name, 'Times:'.
source := String streamContents: [ :s |
s nextPutAll: methodName, ' count'.
s nextPut: Character cr.
s nextPut: Character tab.
s nextPutAll: 'count timesRepeat: [ Transcript show: ''Hi, ', name, '!'' ].' ]
SomeObject class compile: source
Surely there must be something as clean as the Python version?
回答1:
If you just want the source string to more clearly reflect the method:
SomeObject>>addHello: name
| methodTemplate methodSource |
methodTemplate := 'sayHello{1}Times: count
count timesRepeat: [ Transcript show: ''Hi, {1}!'' ].'.
methodSource := methodTemplate format: { name }.
self class compile: methodSource.
If you want the source to be syntax-checked, you could start with a template method like this:
sayHelloTemplate: count
count timesRepeat: [ Transcript show: 'Hi, NAME' ].
And then fill the template accordingly, like:
addHello2: name
| methodTemplate methodSource |
methodTemplate := (self class compiledMethodAt: #sayHelloTemplate:) decompileWithTemps.
methodTemplate selector: ('sayHello', name, 'Times:') asSymbol.
methodSource := methodTemplate sourceText copyReplaceAll: 'NAME' with: name.
self class compile: methodSource.
Of course, all of this would be clearer if some methods were extracted :)
回答2:
Suppose you have template method:
SomeClass>>himaker: aName
Transcript show: 'Hi ...'
Then you can copy it to other class, just don't forget to set selector and class if you don't want to confuse the system browser. Or if you don't care, that just install the copy at method dictionary.
| method |
method := (SomeClass>>#himaker:) copy.
method methodClass: OtherClass.
method selector: #boo: .
OtherClass methodDict at: #boo: put: method.
method := method copy.
method selector: #bar: .
method methodClass: OtherClass2.
OtherClass2 methodDict at: #bar: put: method.
回答3:
Well, compile: takes a String. If you want something more typesafe, you could build a parsetree and use that.
回答4:
I would use block:
himaker := [:name | [:n | n timesRepeat: [Transcript show: 'Hi , ', name, '!']]]
hibob = himaker value: 'bob'.
hialice = himaker value: 'alice'.
hialice value: 2
You can still make himaker a method
himaker: name
^[:n | n timesRepeat: [Transcript show: 'Hi, ', name, '!']]
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4460991/how-can-i-add-methods-to-a-class-at-runtime-in-smalltalk