os.walk very slow, any way to optimise?

霸气de小男生 提交于 2019-12-29 01:39:12

问题


I am using os.walk to build a map of a data-store (this map is used later in the tool I am building)

This is the code I currently use:

def find_children(tickstore):
    children = []
    dir_list = os.walk(tickstore)
    for i in dir_list:
        children.append(i[0])
    return children

I have done some analysis on it:

dir_list = os.walk(tickstore) runs instantly, if I do nothing with dir_list then this function completes instantly.

It is iterating over dir_list that takes a long time, even if I don't append anything, just iterating over it is what takes the time.

Tickstore is a big datastore, with ~10,000 directories.

Currently it takes approx 35minutes to complete this function.

Is there any way to speed it up?

I've looked at alternatives to os.walk but none of them seemed to provide much of an advantage in terms of speed.


回答1:


Yes: use Python 3.5 (which is still currently a RC, but should be out momentarily). In Python 3.5, os.walk was rewritten to be more efficient.

This work done as part of PEP 471.

Extracted from the PEP:

Python's built-in os.walk() is significantly slower than it needs to be, because -- in addition to calling os.listdir() on each directory -- it executes the stat() system call or GetFileAttributes() on each file to determine whether the entry is a directory or not.

But the underlying system calls -- FindFirstFile / FindNextFile on Windows and readdir on POSIX systems -- already tell you whether the files returned are directories or not, so no further system calls are needed. Further, the Windows system calls return all the information for a stat_result object on the directory entry, such as file size and last modification time.

In short, you can reduce the number of system calls required for a tree function like os.walk() from approximately 2N to N, where N is the total number of files and directories in the tree. (And because directory trees are usually wider than they are deep, it's often much better than this.)

In practice, removing all those extra system calls makes os.walk() about 8-9 times as fast on Windows, and about 2-3 times as fast on POSIX systems. So we're not talking about micro-optimizations. See more benchmarks here.




回答2:


A method to optimize it in python2.7, use scandir.walk() instead of os.walk(), the parameters are exactly the same.

import scandir
directory = "/tmp"
res = scandir.walk(directory)
for item in res:
    print item

PS: Just as @recoup mentioned in comment, scandir needs to be installed before usage in python2.7.




回答3:


os.walk is currently quite slow because it first lists the directory and then does a stat on each entry to see if it is a directory or a file.

An improvement is proposed in PEP 471 and should be coming soon in Python 3.5. In the meantime you could use the scandir package to get the same benefits in Python 2.7



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32455262/os-walk-very-slow-any-way-to-optimise

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!