问题
I found out that Java supports constant folding of primitive types, but what about String
s?
Example
If I create the following source code
out.write(""
+ "<markup>"
+ "<nested>"
+ "Easier to read if it is split into multiple lines"
+ "</nested>"
+ "</markup>"
+ "");
What goes into the compiled code?
Combined Version? out.write("<markup><nested>Easier to read if it is split into multiple lines</nested></markup>");
Or the less efficient run-time concatenation version? out.write(new StringBuilder("").append("<markup>").append("<nested>").append("Easier to read if it is split into multiple lines").append("</nested>").append("</markup>").append(""));
回答1:
Here's an easy test:
public static void main(final String[] args) {
final String a = "1" + "2";
final String b = "12";
System.out.println(a == b);
}
Output:
true
So, yes, the compiler will fold.
回答2:
The combined version will be used.
The compiler optimises this automatically and puts it in the String Pool.
You can prove this behaviour easily by writing this line.
System.out.println("abc" == "a" + ("b" + "c")); // Prints true
That this prints true, means that it are the same objects. That is because of two things:
- The compiler optimised
"a" + ("b" + "c")
to"abc"
. - The compiler puts all string literals in the string pool. This behaviour is called String Interning.
回答3:
It effectively translates to:
out.write("<markup><nested>Easier to read if it is split into multiple lines</nested></markup>");
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8581824/does-java-compiler-include-string-constant-folding