问题
So the challenge I'm trying to solve is to find the largest palindrome made from the product of two 3-digit numbers. I'm new to Python and so my code is not elegant or refracted yet, but there is a logical error that I can't seem to find.
def ispalindrome(n):
rev_n = str(n)[::-1]
if n == rev_n:
return True
else:
return False
first_num = 100
second_num = 100
mylist=[]
while first_num < 1000:
while second_num < 1000:
item = first_num * second_num
mylist.append(item)
second_num += 1
second_num = 100
first_num +=1
# print (mylist)
num_as_string = []
for i in mylist:
i = str(i)
num_as_string.append(i)
print("Total products of two 3-digit numbers: {}").format(len(num_as_string))
print("-----------------------------------------------------")
def convert_to_num_list(string_list):
new_num_list = []
item = int(string_list)
new_num_list.append(item)
return new_num_list
palindrome_list = []
for j in num_as_string:
if ispalindrome(j) == True:
palindrome_list.append(j)
palindrome_list.sort()
# print(palindrome_list)
x = convert_to_num_list(j)
largest_palindrome = max(x)
print("Total palindroms of product of two 3-digit numers: {}").format(len(palindrome_list))
print("Largest palindrome = {}").format(largest_palindrome)
The problem is that I'm getting the largest palindrome as 580085, which is 995*583 but is NOT the largest palindrome. I believe the largest palindrome is 906609, which is 993*913, but my code is not finding this. Can anyone help me with the flaw in my logic?
回答1:
Your code does a lot of unnecessary conversion between numbers and strings, which made the error hard to find. The only place in the code that needs a string representation is when determining if the number is a palindrome or not. So that should be the only place that the code does the conversion.
The logic error is in your function convert_to_num_list()
. It takes a string representation of one number and returns a 1-list containing that number. So, "123321"
gets returned as [123321]
. You then take the max()
of that 1-list, which is always the value that was passed to convert_to_num_list()
. So the code never keeps the largest value because if a smaller value comes in later it will be overwritten. The code reports 995*583
as the largest because it comes in later than 993*913
, which in turn is because 995
> 993
.
You can fix that error with an if
statement, but the program is overcomplicated and may well contain other bugs. I recommend reducing the code to the essential task of producing the largest palindrome, without printing out the intermediate results, because the simpler the code the easier it is to see a logic error.
def ispalindrome(n):
return str(n) == str(n)[::-1]
mylist=[]
for first_num in range(100,1000):
for second_num in range(100,1000):
item = first_num*second_num
if ispalindrome(item):
mylist.append(item)
print(max(mylist))
This gives your expected answer:
906609
回答2:
Here is a function for finding the largest palindrome of the product of two 3-digit numbers that I found in stackoverflow.
Link to what i found- https://stackoverflow.com/a/7460573
def is_pal(c):
return int(str(c)[::-1]) == c
maxpal = 0
for a in range(999, 99, -1):
for b in range(a, 99, -1):
prod = a * b
if is_pal(prod) and prod > maxpal:
maxpal = prod
print maxpal
回答3:
n1=999
n2=999
k=0
sl=[]
while n1>1:
count=n1
while count>=1:
result=n1*count
res=str(result)
res1=res[::-1]
if (res==res1):
sl.insert(k,result)
k+=1
count=count-1
n1=n1-1
print("largest pelindrom of 3 digit product is is %d" %(max(sl)))
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44224732/finding-the-largest-palindrome-of-the-product-of-two-3-digit-numbers-in-python