问题
I am implementing std::optional, but have run into a snag with one of its copy constructors.
Here is a sketch of my implementation:
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T>
class optional
{
public:
constexpr optional()
: m_is_engaged(false)
{}
constexpr optional(const optional &other)
: m_is_engaged(false)
{
operator=(other);
}
constexpr optional &operator=(const optional &other)
{
if(other.m_is_engaged)
{
return operator=(*other);
}
else if(m_is_engaged)
{
// destroy the contained object
(**this).~T();
m_is_engaged = false;
}
return *this;
}
template<typename U>
optional &operator=(U &&value)
{
if(m_is_engaged)
{
operator*() = value;
}
else
{
new(operator->()) T(value);
m_is_engaged = true;
}
return *this;
}
T* operator->()
{
return reinterpret_cast<T*>(&m_data);
}
T &operator*()
{
return *operator->();
}
private:
bool m_is_engaged;
typename std::aligned_storage<sizeof(T),alignof(T)>::type m_data;
};
#include <tuple>
int main()
{
optional<std::tuple<float, float, float>> opt;
opt = std::make_tuple(1.f, 2.f, 3.f);
return 0;
}
The problem is that the compiler complains that optional
's constexpr
constructor does not have an empty body:
$ g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp
test.cpp: In copy constructor ‘constexpr optional<T>::optional(const optional<T>&)’:
test.cpp:15:5: error: constexpr constructor does not have empty body
}
^
I'm not sure how to initialize optional::m_data
otherwise, and I haven't been able to find a reference implementation the web (boost::optional
apparently does not use constexpr
).
Any suggestions?
回答1:
In C++11 functions and constructors marked as constexpr
are very limited in what they can do. In the case of constructors, it cannot contain basically anything other than static_assert
, typedef
or using declarations or using directives, which rules out calling operator=
inside the body of the constructor.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21248347/how-to-implement-stdoptionals-copy-constructor