问题
In my Rails project, I'm using VCR and RSpec to test HTTP interactions against an external REST web service that only allows calls to it once per second.
What this means so far is that I end up running my test suite until it fails due to a "number of calls exceeded" error from the web service. At that stage though, at least some cassettes get recorded, so I just continually run the test suite until eventually I get them all recorded and the suite can run using only cassettes (my default_cassette_options = { record: :new_episodes }
). This doesn't seem like an optimal way to do things, especially if I find I need to re-record my cassettes in the future often, and I worry that constant calls could land me on a blacklist with the web service (there's no test server they have that I know about).
So, I ended up trying putting calls to sleep(1)
in my Rspec it
blocks directly before the call to the web service is made, and then refactored those calls up into the VCR configuration:
spec/support/vcr.rb
VCR.configure do |c|
# ...
c.after_http_request do |request, response|
sleep(1)
end
end
Although this seems to work fine, is there a better way to do this? At the moment, if a call to an external service that doesn't have a cassette already is the final test in the suite, then the suite sleeps unnecessarily for 1 second. Likewise, if the time between 2 web service calls without cassettes in the test suite is more than once second, then there's another unnecessary pause. Has anyone made any kind of logic to test for these kinds of conditions, or is there a way to elegantly do this in the VCR configuration?
回答1:
First off, I would recommend against using :new_episodes
as your record mode. It has it's uses, but the default (:once
) is generally what you want. For accuracy, you want to record a cassette as a sequence of HTTP requests that were made in a single pass. With :new_episodes
, you can wind up with cassettes that contain HTTP interactions that were recorded months apart but are now being played back together, and the real HTTP server may not respond in that same fashion.
Secondly, I'd encourage you to listen to the pain exposed by your tests, and find ways to decouple most of your test suite from these HTTP requests. Can you find a way to make it so that just the tests focused on the client, and the end-to-end acceptance tests make the requests? If you wrap the HTTP stuff in a simple interface, it should be easy to substitute a test double for all the other tests, and more easily control your inputs.
That's a longer term fix, though. In the short term, you can tweak your VCR config like so:
VCR.configure do |vcr|
allow_next_request_at = nil
filters = [:real?, lambda { |r| URI(r.uri).host == 'my-throttled-api.com' }]
vcr.after_http_request(*filters) do |request, response|
allow_next_request_at = Time.now + 1
end
vcr.before_http_request(*filters) do |request|
if allow_next_request_at && Time.now < allow_next_request_at
sleep(allow_next_request_at - Time.now)
end
end
end
This uses hook filters (as documented) to run the hooks only on real requests to the API host. allow_next_request_at
is used to sleep the minimum amount of time necessary.
回答2:
An alternative may be to use APICache as a proxy around your HTTP library, as it will handle rate limiting on your behalf.
APICache.get("my_albums", period => 1) do
FlickrRb.get_all_sets
end
This will raise APICache::CannotFetch
when you attempt to call the API more often than your limit.
Here's a link to the APICache Github repo
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12830694/testing-rate-limited-external-api-calls-with-vcr-and-rspec