问题
I am receiving different ROC-AUC scores from sklearn's RandomForestClassifier and roc_curve, auc methods, respectively.
The following code got me an ROC-AUC (i.e. gs.best_score_) of 0.878:
def train_model(mod = None, params = None, features = None,
outcome = ...outcomes array..., metric = 'roc_auc'):
gs = GridSearchCV(mod, params, scoring=metric, loss_func=None, score_func=None,
fit_params=None, n_jobs=-1, iid=True, refit=True, cv=10, verbose=0,
pre_dispatch='2*n_jobs', error_score='raise')
gs.fit(...feature set df..., outcome)
print gs.best_score_
print gs.best_params_
return gs
model = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=2000, n_jobs=-1)
features_to_include = [...list of column names...]
parameters = {
'n_estimators': [...list...], 'max_depth':[...list...],
'min_samples_split':[...list...], 'min_samples_leaf':[...list...]
}
gs = train_model(mod = model, params = parameters, features = features_to_include)
Whereas, the following code got me an ROC-AUC of 0.97:
fpr = dict()
tpr = dict()
roc_auc = dict()
fpr['micro'], tpr['micro'], _ = roc_curve(...outcomes array...,
gs.predict_proba(...feature set df...)[:, 1])
roc_auc['micro'] = auc(fpr['micro'], tpr['micro'])
Why is there such a difference? Did I do something wrong with my code?
Thanks! Chris
回答1:
They would return different values, for two reasons:
since the
GridSearchCV
method splits your data into 10 groups (you are doing 10-fold cross-validation in your code), uses 9 for training, and reports the AUC on the last group. The best_score_ you get is just the highest-reported AUC reported as such (more info read here). Yourroc_curve
calculation reports the AUC on the entire set.The default cross-validation
roc_auc
is the macro version (see here), but your later computation computes the micro version.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35818237/difference-in-roc-auc-scores-in-sklearn-randomforestclassifier-vs-auc-methods