Memory allocation stack

问题

In the stack, memory is reserved for main which we call stack frame for the main function.

When we call the Add function, memory is reserved on top of the stack. In the Add function stack frame, a and b are local pointers and c is an integer which calculates the sum and then we return the reference. c is a local variable of Add function.

Now when the Add function execution is completed the memory space in the stack is also deallocated so when we try to access this address in the main with pointer p, what we are trying to access is basically a deallocated space. The compiler gives a warning but why does it still print the value 5 correctly?

The answer to that may be that the machine didn't deallocate the memory space as it didn't deem it necessary as there were not any more functions. But if we write another function Hello then it should definitely deallocate the space for Add function in the call stack but the program still prints

Yay     5

Is it because like in heap we need to assign a pointer to null after freeing it or else we can still access it? Is something like that related here?

/* void Hello()
   {
     printf("Yay");
   } */

int* Add(int *a,int *b)
{
  int c=*a+*b;
  return &c;
}

int main()
{
  int a=1,b=4;
  int *p=Add(&a,&b);
  // Hello();
  printf("\t%d",*p);
  return 0;
}

回答1:

Assuming c is local int variable, accessing c after function call is undefined-behavior and may print expected result, or may do something unexpected.

Though C doesn't mandate, but typically it is implemented using stack. For performance reasons, when a function returns, it leaves the stack area unchanged. That is the reason why you are seeing the value 5 i.e. 1+4. But you should never count on this.

When you use the second function, behavior still remains undefined so you can get any output. In practice if you define another variable in second function and use it, the output may change.

                       +-----------------+
                       .(local variables).
                       |'''''''''''''''''|
                       |                 |
+----------------+     . PRINTF FUNCTION .
|  c = 42        |     |                 |
|''''''''''''''''|     +-----------------+
|                |     |                 |
.  ADD FUNCTION  .     . HELLO  FUNCTION .
|                |     |                 |
+----------------+     +-----------------+
|  b = 4         |     |  b = 4          |
|''''''''''''''''|     |'''''''''''''''''|
|  a = 1         |     |  a = 1          |
|''''''''''''''''|     |'''''''''''''''''|
|                |     |                 |
.  MAIN FUNCTION .     .  MAIN  FUNCTION .
|                |     |                 |
+----------------+     +-----------------+

In above diagram, I tried to visually represent how the stack might stack look when you are inside Add function and Hello function. You can see that Hello is not messing up with the stack memory that was reserved for c in Add function.

You can verify this by rewriting the Hello function as

void Hello()
{
  int i = 42;
  printf("Yay - %d\n", i);
}

May print 42 in main.

回答2:

To fully understand this I recommend you to learn assembly for your processor and see how your code gets compiled. At this point I think could help if I say that returning from function does not call any memory freeing function, it merely adjusts registers and since between Add and print you didn't do anything that would change the value on the "deallocated" stack, you get the number. Try calling a function that returns.. pfft i dunno 77 in between (but do save it to local variable!) and you will print a different result. Learn the assembly though, be a proper programmer.

回答3:

TL;DR answer, it is undefined behaviour. You cannot reasonify any output of the above execution. Don't be surprised if it ends up printing your mobile phone number or ZIP code. :-)

After the scope has expired, what happens to the stack location, is environment dependent. If not required, the stack space allocated for c might not get reused and hence you're seeing the assumed proper output, but still it is undefined. Someday, in a different environment, you may see a different answer.

Mr. Mothit Jain's answer gives a very detailed explanation of this.

回答4:

The Hello function does not put anything new on the stack, as it has no auto-variables. Consequently the memory location that was previously occupied by c is still unchanged. Change Hello so that it modifies the memory and you'll change the value at p.

void Hello(void)
{
    //This will overwrite the memory previously containing '5' with '3`, the number
    //of characters output by the printf() function.
    int grub = printf("Yay");
}

回答5:

I think it is because that you did not define "stack variable" in Hello function, when I run the below program:

#include <stdio.h>

void Hello()
{
  int tt = 100;
  int tt1 = 5000;
  printf("Yay");
}

int* Add(int *a,int *b)
{
  int c=*a+*b;
  return &c;
}

int main()
{
  int a=1,b=4;
  int *p=Add(&a,&b);
  Hello();
  printf("\t%d",*p);
  return 0;
}

It prints 5000 in my Linux And 1 in my Mac, Anyway I think they are both unexpected value.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27963547/memory-allocation-stack

标签

c++

pointers

memory-management

dangling-pointer