问题
first sql explain analyse:
explain analyse select * from ttq.ttq_post;
Seq Scan on ttq_post (cost=10000000000.00..10000000014.71 rows=171 width=547) (actual time=0.005..0.027 rows=176 loops=1)
Planning Time: 0.033 ms
Execution Time: 0.041 ms
but if use function wrap the same sql
eg:
create or replace function ttq.test_fn_slow()
returns setof ttq.ttq_post
language sql
stable
as $$
select * from ttq.ttq_post;
$$
and exec blow function:
explain analyse select ttq.test_fn_slow();
result:
ProjectSet (cost=0.00..5.27 rows=1000 width=32) (actual time=0.063..0.175 rows=176 loops=1)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning Time: 0.013 ms
Execution Time: 0.192 ms
why use function wrap so slow?
try use "immutable" replace "stable" but the result is same!
回答1:
The additional cost must be due to the fact that you are using the set returning function in the SELECT
clause rather than in the FROM
clause.
Note that the processing of set returning functions in the SELECT
clause changed in PostgreSQL v10, so your version may have an influence on this behavior.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53260000/postgresql-with-function-wrap-sql-so-slow