问题
I have a User
table and an Address
table. They are connected by a join table. The mapping for that is straight forward, but I have some data on the join table that I would like to show up on the Address table.
There may be a better way to set this up also, which I'm open to suggestions for.
Here is the table structure.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[User]
(
[Id] INT NOT NULL IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
...
)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Address]
(
[Id] INT NOT NULL IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
...
)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[AddressType]
(
[Id] INT NOT NULL IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] NVARCHAR( 10 ) NOT NULL, -- Values: 'Shipping', 'Billing'
...
)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[UserAddress]
(
[UserId] INT NOT NULL FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES [dbo].[User]( [Id] ),
[AddressId] INT NOT NULL FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES [dbo].[Address]( [Id] ),
[AddressTypeId] INT NOT NULL FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES [dbo].[AddressType]( [Id] ),
...
)
What I want is to have a list of shipping and billing addresses on the user object. How would I map that? I'm using Fluent NHibernate for mapping.
I originally started out with two join tables, BillingAddress
and ShippingAddress
, that were just joins between the User
and Address
tables. This would work fine, but then there are 2 tables with the exact same structure that do the same thing, and it just didn't seem right.
回答1:
If your join table (e.g. UserAddress) is more than just a pair of foreign keys and has metadata (e.g. AddressType) in it, you need to map the association as a pair of one-to-many relationships and represent the association as an entity in your object model. For example:
User <has-many> AddressAssociation <references> Address
AddressAssociation would have the AddressType as a property. (Basically I'm renaming UserAddress to AddressAssociation to make it sound more like a domain entity.) User to AddressAssociation is a one-to-many from User->AddressAssociation. The references is a many-to-one between AddressAssociation and Address.
回答2:
The best solution is to use two separate tables. I see no real reason why it wouldn't "seem" right.
Now, if you really, really want to make things more complicated, have a look at mapping multiple sets in one table in hibernate
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4197890/nhibernate-mapping-a-many-to-many-with-data-on-join-table