问题
In C++11, is it possible to do something similar to the following?
template<typename T, size_t N>
void foo(array<T, N> src) { ... }
...
foo({1, 2, 3})
I'm currently running GCC 4.8.
回答1:
Yes, I managed to get the following work (since you allow something similar):
template<typename T, size_t N>
void foo(array<T, N> src) { ... }
...
foo('a', 'b');
foo(1, 2, 3);
Here is how:
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
using namespace std;
template<typename T, unsigned long N>
void foo(array<T,N> src) {
for (auto e : src)
cout << e << endl;
}
template<class T, class... Tail>
auto make_array(T head, Tail... tail) -> std::array<T, 1 + sizeof...(Tail)>
{
std::array<T, 1 + sizeof...(Tail)> a = {{ head, tail ... }};
return a;
}
template<class T, class... Tail>
void foo(T&& head, Tail&&... values) {
foo(make_array(std::forward<T>(head), std::forward<Tail>(values)...));
}
int main() {
foo('a', 'b');
foo(1, 2, 3);
}
I have tested this with gcc 4.7.2 and with clang 3.4 (trunk 184647), they work as expected.
Here is an online version at Stacked-Crooked. However, this code fails to compile at Ideone. Since I was unable to figure out the options passed to the compiler at Ideone, I've given up on that site.
I have shamelessly stolen the make_array
function from @Pavel Minaev's answer to the How to emulate C array initialization “int arr[] = { e1, e2, e3, … }” behaviour with std::array? question. The other make_array
suggestions caused compile errors that I couldn't fix.
This make_array
function has limitations, please read the entire post; in particular the discussion std::array - if only it knew its size on comp.lang.c++.moderated is referenced. Apparently, getting a reasonable make_array
is quite tricky. I wouldn't recommend the simple-minded make_array
in this answer to be used in production code.
You wouldn't have any problems if the size was a template argument to std::initializer_list
. Hence the question Why is the size not a template argument of std::initializer_list?
回答2:
Apparently not. The standard (14.8.2.5) calls this an non-deduced context;
In certain contexts, however, the value does not participate in type deduction, but instead uses the values of template arguments that were either deduced elsewhere or explicitly specified.
...
The non-deduced contexts are:
...
- A function parameter for which the associated argument is an initializer list (8.5.4) but the parameter does not have std::initializer_list or reference to possibly cv-qualified std::initializer_list type.
Example:
template<class T> void g(T);
g({1,2,3}); // error: no argument deduced for T
EDIT: You can make the same thing work with std::vector
, if you just use an initializer_list
overload to make the deduction of the type work;
template<typename T>
void foo(const std::vector<T>& src) { ...your code here... }
template<typename T>
void foo(const std::initializer_list<T>& src) { foo(std::vector<T>(src)); }
foo({1,2,3}); // Compiles
...but sadly, since the size of initializer_list
is not a template argument, I can't think of a way to make it deduce and forward the array size from the initializer_list
in the same way as the type.
回答3:
You could use an initializer list directly to achieve that syntax. e.g.:
#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>
void foo(std::initializer_list<int> il) {
for (auto i: il)
std::cout << i < std::endl;
}
int main() {
foo({1,2,3});
}
or make it more generic:
template <typename T>
void foo(std::initializer_list<T> il) {
...
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17388317/c11-implicit-conversion-from-initialization-list-to-array-parameter