HABTM Polymorphic Relationship

Question

I'm pretty new to Rails, and i'm trying to do a polymorphic HABTM relationship. The problem is that I have three models that I want to relate.

The first one is the Event model and then are two kind of attendees: Users and Contacts.

What I want to do is to be able to relate as an attendee both users and contacts. So, what i have right now in my code is:

Event Model

has_and_belongs_to_many :attendees, :polymorphic => true

User Model

has_and_belongs_to_many :events, :as => :attendees

Contact Model

has_and_belongs_to_may :events, :as => :attendees

1. How the HABTM table migration needs to be? I'm a little confused and i have found no help on that.
2. Is it going to work?

Answer 1

No, you can't do that, there's no such thing as a polymorphic has_and_belongs_to_many association.

What you can do is create a middle model. It would probably be something like this:

class Subscription < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :attendee, :polymorphic => true
  belongs_to :event
end

class Event < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :subscriptions
end

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :subscriptions, :as => :attendee
  has_many :events, :through => :subscriptions
end

class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :subscriptions, :as => :attendee
  has_many :events, :through => :subscriptions
end

This way the Subscription model behaves like the link table in a N:N relationship but allows you to have the polymorphic behavior to the Event.

Answer 2

Resolveu parcialmente.

It does solve the problem given the framework that we have at our disposal, but it adds "unnecessary" complexity and code. By creating an intermediary model (which I will call B), and given A -> B -> C being "A has_many B's which has_many C's", we have another AR Model which will load one more AR class implementation into memory once it is loaded, and will instantiate for the sole purpose of reaching C instances. You can always say, if you use the :through association, you don't load the B association, but then you'll be left with an even more obsolete model, which will only be there to see the caravan pass by.

In fact, this might be a feature that is missing from Active Record. I would propose it as a feature to add, since it has been cause of concern for myself (that's how I landed in this post hoping to find a solution :) ).

Cumprimentos