问题
We are currently in the process of migrating an application from Java 7 to Java 8. After fixing a some compilation issues, I stumbled upon an issue similar to the following question: ClassCast Error: Java 7 vs Java 8.
To summarise, here is a sample code that shows the issue:
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(String.valueOf(getVal("xxx"))); // 7: prints the result, 8: Exception
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> T getVal(String param) {
// do some computation based on param...
return (T) result; // actual return type only depends on param so the caller knows what to expect
}
}
The idea was that we would thrust that the caller knows the expected type, and this would avoid him an explicit cast (I don't say this was a good idea…). In a lot of cases, the caller just expects an Object
so there was no implicit cast at all.
As stated in the question above, the String.valueOf
example worked fine in Java 7 because there was no type inference, hence Object
was assumed. Now in Java 8, the compiler chooses the most specific type (here char[]
), which causes a ClastCastException
at runtime.
The problem is that we have around 350 calls of this getVal
method. Is there a way to detect overloaded method calls that would differ between Java 7 and Java 8? I.E. detect when the Java 8 compiler would select a different method from the Java 7 compiler.
回答1:
A better alternative would be:
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(String.valueOf(getVal("xxx"))); // 7: prints the result, 8: Exception
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> T getVal(T param) {
// do some computation based on param...
return param; // actual return type only depends on param so the caller knows what to expect
}
}
which will work in both Java 7 and Java 8.
回答2:
In the end the solution was to change getVal()
to return Object
:
public static Object getVal(String param) {
// do some computation based on param...
return result;
}
and add a second method that also takes the desired class as parameter:
public static <T> T getVal(String param, Class<T> clazz) {
return clazz.cast(getVal(param));
}
then fix all compilation issues (where caller didn't expect Object
) by adding the appropriate class parameter.
Adding a cast would have also worked but it would have caused a lot of warnings for unconditional casts. The unconditional cast is actually still there (through the clazz
parameter), but this allows to easily identify all callers that need a cast as they use the method with 2 parameters.
Additionally – and this is very specific to this case – it appeared that the param
itself was often the result of a method call on some TypedParam<T>
where T
was the expected return type of getVal()
, and which also contained T's class.
I could thus implement an additional convenience method:
public static <T> T getVal(TypedParam<T> param) {
return getVal(param.stringValue(), param.getValueClass());
}
and replaced all getVal(param.stringValue())
by just getVal(param)
.
This solution does not resolve the general case – detect overloaded method calls that would differ between Java 7 and Java 8 – but it resolves it for methods that are known to cause this problem. And we didn't find it elsewhere since then.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30517768/how-to-detect-ambiguous-method-calls-that-would-cause-a-classcastexception-in-ja