问题
i'm having some trouble using a C++11 std::mutex
in my class I have a variable called semaphore of type std::mutex.
So I positioned my semaphore.lock() and semaphore.unlock() before and after my critical section
class Database {
public:
Database(string, string, string, string);
virtual ~Database();
struct sMyHome getMyHome(void);
struct sPhysical getPhysical(int);
struct sSystemInfo getSystemInfo(void);
void commitSystemInfo(struct sSystemInfo);
struct sTSensors getTSensors(int);
struct sWireless getWireless(int);
struct sWirelessConf getWirelessConf(int);
struct sWirelessStatus getWirelessStatus(int);
private:
void queryMyHome(void);
void queryPhysical(int);
void querySystemInfo(void);
void queryTSensors(int ID);
void queryWireless(int ID);
void queryWirelessConf(int ID);
void queryWirelessStatus(int ID);
string toString(int);
struct sMyHome MyHome;
struct sPhysical Physical[4];
struct sSystemInfo SystemInfo;
struct sTSensors TSensors[32];
struct sWireless Wireless[64];
struct sWirelessConf WirelessConf[64];
struct sWirelessStatus WirelessStatus[64];
MYSQL *connection;
mutex semaphore;
};
this is part of the main, where I retrieve the error:
Database db = Database("192.168.1.10", "****", "******", "******");
but the cross-compiler says
../main.cpp:8:73: error: use of deleted function 'Database::Database(const Database&)'
Database db = Database("192.168.1.10", "root", "raspberry", "DomoHome2");
^
In file included from ../main.cpp:2:0:
../Database.h:79:7: note: 'Database::Database(const Database&)' is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
class Database {
^
../Database.h:79:7: error: use of deleted function 'std::mutex::mutex(const std::mutex&)'
In file included from ../Database.h:12:0,
from ../main.cpp:2:
/Volumes/rpi-crosscompiler-toolchain/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/include/c++/4.8.2/mutex:128:5: error: declared here
mutex(const mutex&) = delete;
^
make: *** [main.o] Error 1
and this is my constructor:
Database::Database(string Address, string Username, string Password, string Database) {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
connection = mysql_init(NULL);
mysql_real_connect(connection, Address.c_str(), Username.c_str(), Password.c_str(), Database.c_str(), 0, NULL, 0);
}
回答1:
std::mutex
is neither copyable nor movable. Including one in your class necessitates that your class becomes non-copyable (-movable) as well. If you want your class to be copyable or movable, you will have to tell the compiler how objects of your class are to be copied or moved by implementing copy/move construction/assignment yourself. For example:
class synchronized_int {
mutable std::mutex mtx;
int value;
public:
synchronized_int(int v = 0) : value(v) {}
// Move initialization
synchronized_int(synchronized_int&& other) {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(other.mtx);
value = std::move(other.value);
other.value = 0;
}
// Copy initialization
synchronized_int(const synchronized_int& other) {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(other.mtx);
value = other.value;
}
// Move assignment
synchronized_int& operator = (synchronized_int&& other) {
std::lock(mtx, other.mtx);
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> self_lock(mtx, std::adopt_lock);
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> other_lock(other.mtx, std::adopt_lock);
value = std::move(other.value);
other.value = 0;
return *this;
}
// Copy assignment
synchronized_int& operator = (const synchronized_int& other) {
std::lock(mtx, other.mtx);
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> self_lock(mtx, std::adopt_lock);
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> other_lock(other.mtx, std::adopt_lock);
value = other.value;
return *this;
}
};
回答2:
Declare your mutex dynamically and not statically.
At your Database class header declare the mutex as a pointer, like that:
mutex * semaphore;
and at your constructor initialize the mutex calling his constructor:
semaphore = new std::mutex();
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24272641/how-to-use-a-stdmutex-in-a-class-context