问题
I am looking into the LLVM system and I have read through the Getting Started documentation. However, some of the nomenclature (and the wording in the clang example) is still a little confusing. The following terms and commands are all part of the compilation process, and I was wondering if someone might be able to explain them a little better for me:
clang -Svs.clang -c(I know what-cdoes, but how do the results differ?) * (Edit)- LLVM Bitcode vs. LLVM IR (what is the difference?)
- .ll files vs. .bc files (what are they, how do they differ?)
- LLVM assembly code vs. native assembly code (is there a difference?)
At a higher level, I understand the overall compilation process, and can track my way through fairly well, I just get stuck at some points where, for example, I am expecting to see "IR", but instead see "bitcode" or "LLVM assembly" which leads me to think I don't understand them nearly as well as I should!
回答1:
Clang usage
In general, Clang accepts the same command-line options as GCC. The -c option (only compile and assemble, do not link) and -S option (only compile, do not assemble or link) mean the same thing in both.
LLVM terms regarding the Intermediate Representation
To quote from another answer of mine on this site:
LLVM IR is typically stored on disk in either text files with .ll extension or in binary files with .bc extension. Conversion between the two is trivial, and you can just use
llvm-disfor bc -> ll andllvm-asfor ll -> bc. The binary format is more memory-efficient, while the textual format is human-readable.
In additional, there are some commonly-used aliases:
- The binary format, stored in .bc files, is also called bitcode (though I've occasionally heard the term "bitcode" applied to the general IR as well)
- The IR also called LLVM assembly or the LLVM assembly language
In any case, it all means the same thing, under potentially different representations.
Native Assembly
Native assembly is what many typically think about when hearing the term "assembly" - the low-level language with almost 1:1 mapping to your native machine binary, and unlike LLVM assembly, native assembly is very target-dependent (examples are x86 assembly, ARM assembly, etc.). Native assembly is assembled into native binary via an assembler - LLVM does include one, though you can also use other assemblers as well (e.g. gas).
Native binary - the result of the assembling process - is of course the (only) language the computer really speaks, and after linking it can be loaded into memory and be ran directly on your hardware.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14107743/llvm-and-compiler-nomenclature