问题
Most proof assistants are functional programming languages with dependent types. They can proof programs/algorithms. I'm interested, instead, in proof assistant suitable best for mathematics and only (calculus for instance). Can you recommend one? I heard about Mizar but I don’t like that the source code is closed, but if it is best for math I will use it. How well the new languages such as Agda and Idris are suited for mathematical proofs?
回答1:
Coq has extensive libraries covering real analysis. Various developments come to mind:
the standard library and projects building on it such as the now defunct coqtail project [1] (with extensive coverage of power series and quite a bit of work on Complex numbers) or the more recent coquelicot. All of these rely on an axiomatic definition of the reals presented here.
A more constructive approach is delivered by the C-CoRN project which starts by actually building the reals.
Another way to tackle the reals is to turn to non-standard analysis. This is what people using ACL2 have been doing.
For a more general view of the field, you should probably read this survey paper by the people involved in the coquelicot project.
[1] full disclosure: I was involved in that project
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28538510/proof-assistant-for-mathematics-only