问题
In my application, I am performing my file reading by another thread(other that GUI thread). There are two buttons that suspend and resume the Thread respectively.
private void BtnStopAutoUpd_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
autoReadThread.Suspend();
}
private void BtnStartAutoUpd_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
autoReadThread.Resume();
}
but I am facing this warning,
Thread.Suspend has been deprecated. Please use other classes in System.Threading, such as Monitor, Mutex, Event, and Semaphore, to synchronize Threads or protect resources. http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=14202
Any how I run only single thread (rather than GUI thread), so How can I apply Synchronization here, or monitor.
Update Code:
class ThreadClass
{
// This delegate enables asynchronous calls for setting the text property on a richTextBox control.
delegate void UpdateTextCallback(object text);
// create thread that perform actual task
public Thread autoReadThread = null;
public ManualResetEvent _event = new ManualResetEvent(true);
// a new reference to rich text box
System.Windows.Forms.RichTextBox Textbox = null;
private volatile bool _run;
public bool Run
{
get { return _run; }
set { _run = value; }
}
public ThreadClass(string name, System.Windows.Forms.RichTextBox r1)
{
Textbox = r1;
Run = true;
this.autoReadThread = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(UpdateText));
this.autoReadThread.Start(name);
}
private void UpdateText(object fileName)
{
//while (true)
//{
// _event.WaitOne();
while (Run)
{
if (Textbox.InvokeRequired)
{
UpdateTextCallback back = new UpdateTextCallback(UpdateText);
Textbox.BeginInvoke(back, new object[] { fileName });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
else
{
string fileToUpdate = (string)fileName;
using (StreamReader readerStream = new StreamReader(fileToUpdate))
{
Textbox.Text = readerStream.ReadToEnd();
}
break;
//}
}
}
}
}
}
run is bool value, a thread controls it(Initially its true)
and to start thread I am creating this class instance(this start thread also) in other class
回答1:
//true makes the thread start as "running", false makes it wait on _event.Set()
ManualResetEvent _event = new ManualResetEvent(true);
Thread _thread = new Thread(ThreadFunc);
public void ThreadFunc(object state)
{
while (true)
{
_event.Wait();
//do operations here
}
}
_thread.Start();
// to suspend thread.
_event.Reset();
//to resume thread
_event.Set();
Note that all operations are completed before the thread is "suspended"
What you want
private void ThreadFunc(object fileName)
{
string fileToUpdate = (string)fileName;
while (Run)
{
_event.WaitOne();
string data;
using (StreamReader readerStream = new StreamReader(fileToUpdate))
{
data = readerStream.ReadToEnd();
}
if (Textbox.InvokeRequired)
{
UpdateTextCallback back = new UpdateTextCallback(UpdateText);
Textbox.BeginInvoke(back, new object[] { data });
}
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
}
private void UpdateText(string data)
{
Textbox.Text = data;
}
回答2:
The reason Suspend and Resume are deprecated is because there are no guarantees at what point in the execution the thread will be suspended on. This is a bad thing. The issue is described here as well as a solution.
The solution should involved a WaitHandle (maybe AutoResetEvent or ManualResetEvent) which you can use to signal to your autoReadThread to stop/start.
回答3:
I would use the Monitor mechanism for achieving pausing and resuming threads. The Monitor.Wait will cause the thread to wait for the Monitor.Pulse.
private bool _pause = false;
private object _threadLock = new object();
private void RunThread()
{
while (true)
{
if (_pause)
{
lock (_threadLock)
{
Monitor.Wait(_threadLock);
}
}
// Do work
}
}
private void PauseThread()
{
_pause = true;
}
private void ResumeThread()
{
_pause = false;
lock (_threadLock)
{
Monitor.Pulse(_threadLock);
}
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4509067/c-sharp-threading-suspend-in-obsolete-thread-has-been-deprecated