问题
I use sp_start_job
to start a job.
The job (test2
) has only one step:
select getdate()
waitfor delay '00:00:10'
The TRY/CATCH
code:
begin try
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_start_job @job_name = 'test2'
end try
begin catch
print 'error'
end catch
First run of the code:
Job 'test2' started successfully.
Second run of the code (within 10 seconds):
Msg 22022, Level 16, State 1, Line 0
SQLServerAgent Error: Request to run job test2 (from User sa) refused because the job is already running from a request by User sa.
Why does TRY/CATCH
not work in this scenario?
UPDATE: I should added at first that I am working on a sql server 2005 which has linked servers (sql server 2000). I was trying to write a proc on the sql server 2005 server to see a job on all the linked servers. If the job is not running, run it. Initially, I used try - catch and hoped to catch any error when run the already running job but failed (this thread).
I finally used following code: (it won't compile, you need to substitute some variables, just gives an idea)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[#jobInfo](
[job_id] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[originating_server] [nvarchar](30) ,
[name] [nvarchar](128) ,
[enabled] [tinyint] NULL,
[description] [nvarchar](512) ,
[start_step_id] [int] NULL,
[category] [nvarchar](128) ,
[owner] [nvarchar](128) ,
[notify_level_eventlog] [int] NULL,
[notify_level_email] [int] NULL,
[notify_level_netsend] [int] NULL,
[notify_level_page] [int] NULL,
[notify_email_operator] [nvarchar](128) ,
[notify_netsend_operator] [nvarchar](128) ,
[notify_page_operator] [nvarchar](128) ,
[delete_level] [int] NULL,
[date_created] [datetime] NULL,
[date_modified] [datetime] NULL,
[version_number] [int] NULL,
[last_run_date] [int] NOT NULL,
[last_run_time] [int] NOT NULL,
[last_run_outcome] [int] NOT NULL,
[next_run_date] [int] NOT NULL,
[next_run_time] [int] NOT NULL,
[next_run_schedule_id] [int] NOT NULL,
[current_execution_status] [int] NOT NULL,
[current_execution_step] [nvarchar](128) ,
[current_retry_attempt] [int] NOT NULL,
[has_step] [int] NULL,
[has_schedule] [int] NULL,
[has_target] [int] NULL,
[type] [int] NOT NULL
)
SET @sql =
'INSERT INTO #jobInfo
SELECT * FROM OPENQUERY( [' + @srvName + '],''set fmtonly off exec msdb.dbo.sp_help_job'')'
EXEC(@sql)
IF EXISTS (select * from #jobInfo WHERE [name] = @jobName AND current_execution_status IN (4,5)) -- 4: idle, 5: suspended
BEGIN
SET @sql = 'EXEC [' + @srvName + '].msdb.dbo.sp_start_job @job_name = ''' + @jobName + ''''
--print @sql
EXEC (@sql)
INSERT INTO #result (srvName ,status ) VALUES (@srvName, 'Job started.')
END ELSE BEGIN
INSERT INTO #result (srvName ,status ) VALUES (@srvName, 'Job is running already. No action taken.')
END
回答1:
Not all errors can be caught by TRY/CATCH
. In this case, sp_start_job
actually calls external procedures, and these are outside the bounds of SQL Server's error handling. Or at least that's the story that they're sticking to:
http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/362112/sp-start-job-error-handling
Also note that this is still a problem in SQL Server 2012 SP1 CU3. Please vote and comment if you want this bug fixed.
A tedious but viable workaround, which requires certain permissions and in this case assumes the job owner is sa
:
DECLARE @x TABLE
(
a VARBINARY(32),b INT,c INT,d INT,e INT,f INT,g INT,h INT,i NVARCHAR(64),
Running BIT, -- the only important column
k INT,l INT,m INT
);
DECLARE @job_id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
SELECT @job_id = job_id FROM msdb.dbo.sysjobs WHERE name = N'test2';
INSERT @x EXEC master.dbo.xp_sqlagent_enum_jobs 1, N'sa', @job_id;
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM @x WHERE Running = 0)
BEGIN
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_start_job @job_name = N'test2';
END
ELSE
BEGIN
PRINT 'error';
END
Even better might be:
DECLARE @job_id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER, @d DATETIME;
SELECT @job_id = job_id FROM msdb.dbo.sysjobs WHERE name = N'test2';
SELECT @d = stop_execution_date
FROM msdb.dbo.sysjobactivity WHERE job_id = @job_id;
IF @d IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_start_job @job_name = N'test2';
END
ELSE
BEGIN
PRINT 'error';
END
In either case, it is still possible that the job has started between the check for its status and the call to start it, so this doesn't eliminate errors from sp_start_job
altogether, but it makes them far less likely to occur.
回答2:
You can use alerts to execute SQL Agent jobs. And you can use alerts' options to configure required response. (this will help you to totally avoid error 22022 but you will have additional records in the errorlog)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15658978/try-catch-does-not-work-on-sql-server-agent-error