问题
I'd like to expose a property on a view model that contains a list of objects (from database).
I need this collection to be read-only. That is, I want to prevent Add/Remove, etc. But allow the foreach and indexers to work. My intent is to declare a private field holding the editable collection and reference it with a read-only Public Property. As follows
public ObservableCollection<foo> CollectionOfFoo {
get {
return _CollectionOfFoo;
}
}
However, that syntax just prevents changing the reference to the collection. It doesn't prevent add/remove, etc.
What is the right way to accomplish this?
回答1:
The [previously] accepted answer will actually return a different ReadOnlyObservableCollection every time ReadOnlyFoo is accessed. This is wasteful and can lead to subtle bugs.
A preferable solution is:
public class Source
{
Source()
{
m_collection = new ObservableCollection<int>();
m_collectionReadOnly = new ReadOnlyObservableCollection<int>(m_collection);
}
public ReadOnlyObservableCollection<int> Items
{
get { return m_collectionReadOnly; }
}
readonly ObservableCollection<int> m_collection;
readonly ReadOnlyObservableCollection<int> m_collectionReadOnly;
}
See ReadOnlyObservableCollection anti-pattern for a full discussion.
回答2:
I don't like using ReadOnlyObservableCollection<T>
as it seems like a mistake / broken class; I prefer a contract based approach instead.
Here is what I use that allows for covarience:
public interface INotifyCollection<T>
: ICollection<T>,
INotifyCollectionChanged
{}
public interface IReadOnlyNotifyCollection<out T>
: IReadOnlyCollection<T>,
INotifyCollectionChanged
{}
public class NotifyCollection<T>
: ObservableCollection<T>,
INotifyCollection<T>,
IReadOnlyNotifyCollection<T>
{}
public class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
var full = new NotifyCollection<string>();
var readOnlyAccess = (IReadOnlyCollection<string>) full;
var readOnlyNotifyOfChange = (IReadOnlyNotifyCollection<string>) full;
//Covarience
var readOnlyListWithChanges =
new List<IReadOnlyNotifyCollection<object>>()
{
new NotifyCollection<object>(),
new NotifyCollection<string>(),
};
}
}
回答3:
You could change the type of your property to be an IEnumerable:
public IEnumerable<foo> CollectionOfFoo {
get {
return _CollectionOfFoo;
}
}
I don't believe there is a standard interface that exposes an indexer. If you need it you could write an interface and extend ObservableCollection to implement it:
public interface IIndexerCollection<T> : IEnumerable<T>
{
T this[int i]
{
get;
}
}
public class IndexCollection<T> : ObservableCollection<T>, IIndexerCollection<T>
{
}
回答4:
You could also override the list class that you're using and put an immutable flag in one of the constructors such that it will not add/remove if it was constructed with the immutable flag set to true.
回答5:
Use ReadOnlyObservableCollection< T >
public ReadOnlyObservableCollection<T> ReadOnlyFoo
{
get { return new ReadOnlyObservableCollection<T> (_CollectionOfFoo); }
}
As has been pointed out, please use Eric J's answer as this one mistakenly is returning a new instance every time.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1763696/how-can-i-make-a-read-only-observablecollection-property