问题
I'm using a <xe:djTabContainer>
with 10 <xe:djTabPane>
containing numerous fields components.
There is a principal combobox whose value will determine which fields to be showed or not and in this way the document structure will be achieved.
If I will use this approach, then for all my >50 fields which I want to show/hide, I will use only the onChange
event of the combobox?
Considering the fact that there are >50 fields which enter in this category < showing&hiding them >, should I use another approach / method? Thanks for your time.
<xp:comboBox value="#{Contr.txt_tipcontractcv}" id="comboBox4"> <xp:selectItems id="selectItems1">
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[#{javascript:return ""}]]></xp:this.value>
</xp:selectItems>
<xp:selectItems id="selectItems2">
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[#{javascript:@DbColumn(@DbName(),"SetupvwTipuriContracteC",1);}]]> </xp:this.value>
</xp:selectItems>
<xp:eventHandler event="onchange" submit="false"> <xp:this.script><![CDATA[XSP.partialRefreshPost("#{id:FisaP}", {
});
]]></xp:this.script> </xp:eventHandler> </xp:comboBox>
and the panel:
<xp:panel id="FisaP">
<xp:label id="label4"
style="color:rgb(128,0,0);font-family:verdana;font-size:9pt;font-weight:bold">
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[#{javascript:"Fisa contract "+ Contr.getItemValueString("txt_tipcontractcv")}]]></xp:this.value>
<xp:this.rendered><![CDATA[#{javascript:
Contr.getItemValueString("txt_tipcontractcv") != ""
}]]></xp:this.rendered>
</xp:label>
</xp:panel>
回答1:
I would turn it around. Let the labels and fields ask the combobox if they should be rendered or not. Let the combobox's onchange event initiate a partial refresh of a panel which includes all fields you want to show/hide.
If your >50 fields are all on one place you can frame them with a panel and set the rendered property there.
If your combobox is bound to a viewScope variable the rendered property of fields/labels would be
rendered="#{javascript:viewScope.tipcontractcv1 == 'Vanzare-Cumparare'}"
or if it is bound to a document field then
rendered="#{javascript:document1.getItemValueString('txt_tipcontractcv1') === 'Vanzare-Cumparare'}"
Update:
Based on your code in your answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/25636661/2065611 take the following steps so get it to work with the Dojo Tab Container:
1.
Put the labels and fields in panels which do have an id but don't have a rendered attribute
<xp:panel id="panel1">
<xp:label value="Persoane spre informare" ... id="label2">
<xp:this.rendered><![CDATA[#{javascript:
Contr.getItemValueString("txt_tipcontractcv1") == "Vanzare-Cumparare"
}]]></xp:this.rendered>
</xp:label>
... other label and fields ...
</xp:panel>
You can create other panels "panel2", "panel3", ... too. They can be placed in different djTabPanes.
2.
Change the onchange
event of your combobox and execute client side code to refresh the panels
<xp:eventHandler
event="onchange"
submit="false">
<xp:this.script><![CDATA[
XSP.partialRefreshPost("#{id:panel1}", {
onComplete: function() {
XSP.partialRefreshPost("#{id:panel2}");
}
});
]]></xp:this.script>
</xp:eventHandler>
3.
You can optimize your code if you put labels and fields with the same rendered attribute together into an additional panel
<xp:panel id="panel1">
<xp:panel id="panelRendered1"
<xp:this.rendered><![CDATA[#{javascript:
Contr.getItemValueString("txt_tipcontractcv1") == "Vanzare-Cumparare"
}]]></xp:this.rendered>
<xp:label value="Persoane spre informare" ... id="label2" />
... other label and fields ...
</xp:panel>
</xp:panel>
回答2:
First... never do this:
if (comboVal == "Vanzare-Cumparare")
Even though it's called "SSJS".. it's really not "JavaScript"... you're pretty much working with Java. In Java everything is an object. Even a literal string. So by entering "Vanzare-Cumparare" you're pretty much creating a new Object. You can see this in the typeahead of the SSJS editor. Try typing "anything". <-- Note you NEED to type in that period.
The way to do that if statement is:
if ("Vanzare-Cumparare".equalsIgnoreCase(comboVal)
you could reverse it I think:
if (comboVal.equalsIgnoreCase("Vanzare-Cumparare")
Should give you the same result. I think sometimes you can get away with using the == but mostly likely it's going to bite you at some point no matter what. So I recommend never doing that.
I'm not sure I'm following your approach here. I guess it makes some sense but if it were me I'd do it differently. I know that personally I've NEVER tried to grab the component in SSJS like this: var combo:javax.faces.component.UIComponent - I've never seen the need. I'd prefer to use a scoped variable and then in the label's rendering property grab that scoped variable and use that to determine your rendering value - true or false.
回答3:
I see a real problem. If the component is not currently rendered, you cannot get a handle to it with getComponent. If you simply change the display value, then the component is always there, even if it's not displayed.
Something like this:
var combo:javax.faces.component.UIComponent = getComponent("txt_tipcontractcv1");
var comboVal = combo.getValue();
if (comboVal.equalsIgnoreCase("Vanzare-Cumparare")) {
document.getElementById("#{id:label2}").style.display = "block"; // or "inline"
} else {
document.getElementById("#{id:label2}").style.display = "none";
}
You need to ensure that the label2 element is always rendered, so that the style indicates whether it is visible.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25619967/xpages-hiding-showing-fields-based-on-a-combobox-value