Inline constructors and One Definition Rule

问题

Consider following source files 1.cpp

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

struct X
{
    X()
    {
        cout << "1" << endl;
    }
};

void bar();

void foo()
{
    X x;
}

int main()
{
    foo();
    bar();
    return 0;
}

2.cpp

#include <cstdio>

struct X
{
    X()
    {
        printf("2\n");
    }
};

void bar()
{
    X x;
}

Is program compiled from these files well-formed? What should be in it's output?

I've expected linker error due to violation of One Definition Rule or output "1 2". However it prints out "1 1" when compiled with g++ 3.4 and VC 8.0.
How this can be explained?

回答1:

This does violate ODR (3.2) - specifically that you can have more than one definition of an inline function, but those definitions must be identical (3.2/5) - and leads to undefined behavior, so anything may happen and the compiler/linker is not required to diagnose that. The most likely reason why you see that behavior is that function calls are inlined and do not participate in linking, so no link error is emitted.

回答2:

It is undefined behaviour (with no required diagnostic) if inlined functions (such as your class constructor) have different definitions in different translation units.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9389977/inline-constructors-and-one-definition-rule