Adding SOAP implicit headers to WSDL

别来无恙 提交于 2019-12-17 22:35:25

问题


My question is similar to this. How To Pass Soap Header When WSDL Doesn't Define It? But is different.

For a web service I use, all methods need authentication which is sent in cleartext inside a SOAP header. However, my WSDL doesn't include any soap header information. I have a custom platform tool which I must use to generate code from the WSDL. Since the header info is not available, am unable to use the generated class directly - I do not want to manually modify the code to accommodate the header.

I tried specifying the SOAP header in the WSDL but I failed to get the correct namespaces. The WSDL is here https://stage.totalcheck.sensis.com.au/service/webservice?wsdl and the SOAP header is as follows:

    <soapenv:Header>
        <wsse:Security>
            <wsse:UsernameToken>
                <wsse:Username>username</wsse:Username>
                <wsse:Password>password</wsse:Password>
            </wsse:UsernameToken>
        </wsse:Security>
   </soapenv:Header>

Can someone help me? Thanks!


回答1:


From a conceptual point of view, WSDL is not supposed to define headers. WSDL is only for defining the functional aspects of a service, like operations, messages, binding and endpoints. Messages and bindings define how the payload of messages should be encoded and formatted.

The headers of SOAP messages however do not belong to the payload. They are typically used for configuring non-functional properties of a SOAP processor. Security is such a non-functional property. The functional aspect of the payload is not affected. It is only assured that the communication is secured and the WS tool stack, not the service implementation, should take care of that.

So the missing piece is now a standard that allows for attaching some non-functional requirements to WSDL services, so that code generators can automatically derive which headers need to be sent and/or understand in order to fulfill the non-functional property as desired -- without having to manually deal with header fields. This standard exists and is called WS-Policy. A policy contains typically a set of alternatives that expose a set of requirements that both, provider and consumer should be able to fulfill. When two services are supposed to interact with each other, both policies are taken and a so called "effective policy" is calculated. It defines the common non-functional requirements. Using this information, provider and consumer can configure themselves to add required headers, like the WS-Security headers. WS-SecurityPolicy also defines a set of policies that can be used. WS-PolicyAttachment defines how such policies can be attached to a WSDL.

There are code generators that can deal with WS-Policies, e.g. Metro or Axis2




回答2:


You can add soap header information to method calls by decorating the methods in the proxy class generated from the wsdl with the SoapHeader attribute.

For example wsdl.exe will generate client proxy class Reference.cs for the web service reference when you "Add Web Reference". In the link mentioned above https://stage.totalcheck.sensis.com.au/service/webservice?wsdl there is a message suggestAddress which will translate to a method in the generated reference.cs client proxy code file when you add a web reference from visual studio. By default when this method is called there will be no Header in the soap envelope. To add a SoapHeader to the envelope for this request add a [SoapHeader("Security")] attribute to the top of the SuggestAddress method in the Reference.cs generated class, where "Security" is a class that inherits from SoapHeader base class.

Example for the above required Security SoapHeader you would create the following classes,

public partial class Security : SoapHeader
{
    public UserNameToken UserNameToken { get; set; }
}

public partial class UserNameToken
{
    public string UserName { get; set; }
    public string Password { get; set; }
}

Then you would decorate the SuggestAddress method in the reference.cs like followed,

[SoapHeader("Security")]
public suggestAddressesResult suggestAddresses([System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute(Form=System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaForm.Unqualified)] addressSearch search) {
        object[] results = this.Invoke("suggestAddresses", new object[] {search});
        return ((suggestAddressesResult)(results[0]));
    }

This will ensure that every envelope created when method suggestAddress is invoked contains a security header that looks like the one mentioned above,

<soapenv:Header>
    <wsse:Security>
        <wsse:UsernameToken>
            <wsse:Username>username</wsse:Username>
            <wsse:Password>password</wsse:Password>
        </wsse:UsernameToken>
    </wsse:Security>




回答3:


Key for me in using this question to help myself was recognizing (as some pointed out) that the headers in question are those of WS-Security standard.

If your proxy generating tool is "custom" it seems logical that you might have a switch to automatically add the headers for WS-Security. However, if you're using WSDL.exe ("Add Web Reference" in Visual Studio), consider svcutil.exe instead ("Add Service Reference").

If you use a WCF proxy, you can override the given config and allow WCF to add the headers for you:

<security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential">
    <transport clientCredentialType="None" proxyCredentialType="None" realm="" />
    <message clientCredentialType="UserName" algorithmSuite="Default" />
</security>

From there you can specify the password:

RemoteSvcProxy.TheirClient client = new RemoteSvcProxy.TheirClient();
client.ClientCredentials.UserName.UserName = "uname";
client.ClientCredentials.UserName.Password = "pwd";

I don't know what your custom tool is, but perhaps the framework it's based on also has similar configuration options.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5726127/adding-soap-implicit-headers-to-wsdl

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!