Resurrection difference in using Object Initializer

为君一笑 提交于 2019-12-17 17:04:16

问题


I have this code:

Essentially i'm trying to demonstrate the use of the c# finalizer and make an object that cannot die, I called it Zombie. Now, normally this demo works great, but today I tried using the same code with the object initializer instead of just assigning to the property (Name in this case). I noticed there is a difference. Namely that the finalizer never gets called, not even when I'm trying my best to make the Garbage Collector do it's work.

Could someone explain the difference, or have I found a bug in the C# compiler?

(I'm using C# 4 in VS2010 SP1 on Win7x64)

Thanks.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading;

namespace Zombie
{
  class Program
  {
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
      Console.WriteLine("Main thread: " + Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);

              // case 1: this is where the problem is located.
      Zombie z = new Zombie { Name = "Guy" }; // object initializer syntax makes that the finalizer is not called.

              // case 2: this is not causing a problem. The finalizer gets called.
      //Zombie z = new Zombie();
      //z.Name = "Guy";

      WeakReference weakZombieGuyRef = new WeakReference(z, true);

      z = null;

      GC.GetTotalMemory(forceFullCollection: true);

      GC.Collect();

      while (true)
      {

        Console.ReadKey();
        if (weakZombieGuyRef.IsAlive)
        {
          Console.WriteLine("zombie guy still alive");
        }
        else
        {
          Console.WriteLine("Zombie guy died.. silver bullet anyone?");
        }

        Zombie.Instance = null;

        GC.AddMemoryPressure(12400000);
        GC.GetTotalMemory(forceFullCollection: true);

        GC.Collect();
      }


    }
  }

  public class Zombie
  {
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public  static Zombie Instance = null;

    ~Zombie()
    {
      Console.WriteLine(Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
      Console.WriteLine("Finalizer called on zombie" + this.Name);
      lock (typeof(Zombie))
      {
        Instance = this;

        GC.ReRegisterForFinalize(this);
      }
    }
  }
}

回答1:


EDIT: While the original answer below is still accurate, it looks like it's the mixture of debug information and optimization which makes a difference here.

From my experiments:

Compiler flags                        Result
/o+ /debug-                           Finalizer runs
/o+ /debug+                           Finalizer runs
/o- /debug-                           Finalizer runs
/o- /debug+                           Finalizer does *not* run

The finalizer is still called on my box, when compiling on the command line with /o+. My guess is that you're running in a debugger - which changes the GC behaviour. Without the debugger, the GC will collect anything that it can prove will never be read. With the debugger, I believe the GC won't collect any objects which still have references on the stack, even if there's no code to read the variables in question.

Now with an object initializer, the compiler code includes an extra reference on the stack. This line:

Zombie z = new Zombie { Name = "Guy" };

is effectively:

Zombie tmp = new Zombe();
tmp.Name = "Guy";
Zombie z = tmp;

The assignment to z is only performed after all the properties have been set.

My guess is that the tmp variable here is keeping the object alive.




回答2:


If you want objects that don't die, you really don't need to mess with finalizers. Just have a private static list of all instances, and add objects to that list as they are created:

class Immortal
{
    static List<Immortal> _immortals = new List<Immortal>();

    public Immortal()
    {
       _immortals.Add(this);
    }
}


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9753256/resurrection-difference-in-using-object-initializer

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!