What is the meaning and reasoning behind the Open/Closed Principle?

问题

The Open/Closed Principle states that software entities (classes, modules, etc.) should be open for extension, but closed for modification. What does this mean, and why is it an important principle of good object-oriented design?

回答1:

Specifically, it is about a "Holy Grail" of design in OOP of making an entity extensible enough (through its individual design or through its participation in the architecture) to support future unforseen changes without rewriting its code (and sometimes even without re-compiling **).

Some ways to do this include Polymorphism/Inheritance, Composition, Inversion of Control (a.k.a. DIP), Aspect-Oriented Programming, Patterns such as Strategy, Visitor, Template Method, and many other principles, patterns, and techniques of OOAD.

** See the 6 "package principles", REP, CCP, CRP, ADP, SDP, SAP

回答2:

It means that you should put new code in new classes/modules. Existing code should be modified only for bug fixing. New classes can reuse existing code via inheritance.

Open/closed principle is intended to mitigate risk when introducing new functionality. Since you don't modify existing code you can be assured that it wouldn't be broken. It reduce maintenance cost and increase product stability.

回答3:

It's the answer to the fragile base class problem, which says that seemingly innocent modifications to base classes may have unintended consequences to inheritors that depended on the previous behavior. So you have to be careful to encapsulate what you don't want relied upon so that the derived classes will obey the contracts defined by the base class. And once inheritors exist, you have to be really careful with what you change in the base class.

回答4:

More specifically than DaveK, it usually means that if you want to add additional functionality, or change the functionality of a class, create a subclass instead of changing the original. This way, anyone using the parent class does not have to worry about it changing later on. Basically, it's all about backwards compatibility.

Another really important principle of object-oriented design is loose coupling through a method interface. If the change you want to make does not affect the existing interface, it really is pretty safe to change. For example, to make an algorithm more efficient. Object-oriented principles need to be tempered by common sense too :)

回答5:

Software entities should be open for extension but closed for modification

That means any class or module should be written in a way that it can be used as is, can be extended, but neve modified

Bad Example in Javascript

var juiceTypes = ['Mango','Apple','Lemon'];
function juiceMaker(type){
    if(juiceTypes.indexOf(type)!=-1)
        console.log('Here is your juice, Have a nice day');
    else
        console.log('sorry, Error happned');
}

exports.makeJuice = juiceMaker;

Now if you want to add Another Juice type, you have to edit the module itself, By this way, we are breaking OCP .

Good Example in Javascript

var juiceTypes = [];
function juiceMaker(type){
    if(juiceTypes.indexOf(type)!=-1)
        console.log('Here is your juice, Have a nice day');
    else
        console.log('sorry, Error happned');
}
function addType(typeName){
    if(juiceTypes.indexOf(typeName)==-1)
        juiceTypes.push(typeName);
}
function removeType(typeName){
  let index = juiceTypes.indexOf(typeName)
    if(index!==-1)
        juiceTypes.splice(index,1);
}

exports.makeJuice = juiceMaker;
exports.addType = addType;
exports.removeType = removeType;

Now, you can add new juice types from outside the module without editing the same module.

回答6:

The principle means that it should easy to add new functionality without having to change existing, stable, and tested functionality, saving both time and money.

Often, polymorhism, for instance using interfaces, is a good tool for achieving this.

回答7:

An additional rule of thumb for conforming to OCP is to make base classes abstract with respect to functionality provided by derived classes. Or as Scott Meyers says 'Make Non-leaf classes abstract'.

This means having unimplemented methods in the base class and only implement these methods in classes which themselves have no sub classes. Then the client of the base class cannot rely on a particular implementation in the base class since there is none.

回答8:

I just want to emphasize that "Open/Closed", even though being obviously useful in OO programming, is a healthy method to use in all aspects of development. For instance, in my own experience it's a great painkiller to use "Open/Closed" as much as possible when working with plain C.

/Robert

回答9:

This means that the OO software should be built upon, but not changed intrinsically. This is good because it ensures reliable, predictable performance from the base classes.

回答10:

I was recently given an additional idea of what this principle entails: that the Open-Closed Principle describes at once a way of writing code, as well as an end-result of writing code in a resilient way.

I like to think of Open/Closed split up in two closely-related parts:

Code that is Open to change can either change its behavior to correctly handle its inputs, or requires minimum modification to provide for new usage scenarios.
Code that is Closed for modification does not require much if any human intervention to handle new usage scenarios. The need simply does not exist.

Thus, code that exhibits Open/Closed behavior (or, if you prefer, fulfills the Open/Closed Principle) requires minimal or no modification in response to usage scenarios beyond what it was originally built for.

As far as implementation is concerned? I find that the commonly-stated interpretation, "Open/Closed refers to code being polymorphic!" to be at best an incomplete statement. Polymorphism in code is one tool to achieve this sort of behavior; Inheritance, Implementation...really, every object-oriented design principle is necessary to write code that is resilient in the way implied by this principle.

回答11:

In Design principle, SOLID – the "O" in "SOLID" stands for the open/closed principle.

Open Closed principle is a design principle which says that a class, modules and functions should be open for extension but closed for modification.

This principle states that the design and writing of the code should be done in a way that new functionality should be added with minimum changes in the existing code (tested code). The design should be done in a way to allow the adding of new functionality as new classes, keeping as much as possible existing code unchanged.

Benefit of Open Closed Design Principle:

Application will be more robust because we are not changing already tested class.
Flexible because we can easily accommodate new requirements.
Easy to test and less error prone.

My blog post on this:

http://javaexplorer03.blogspot.in/2016/12/open-closed-design-principle.html

回答12:

There are two versions of the Open Closed Principle.

See the following for a clear and thorough explanation of both: https://www.slideshare.net/pjschwarz/first-expedia-tech-know-how-event-the-openclosed-principle-the-original-version-and-the-contemporary-version

To whet your appetite, here are screenshots of the first few slides:

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59016/what-is-the-meaning-and-reasoning-behind-the-open-closed-principle

标签

oop

definition

solid-principles

design-principles

open-closed-principle