问题
In this pgexercises about joining 3 different tables, the answer is given as following:
select mems.firstname || ' ' || mems.surname as member,
facs.name as facility,
case
when mems.memid = 0 then
bks.slots*facs.guestcost
else
bks.slots*facs.membercost
end as cost
from
cd.members mems
inner join cd.bookings bks
on mems.memid = bks.memid
inner join cd.facilities facs
on bks.facid = facs.facid
where
bks.starttime >= '2012-09-14' and
bks.starttime < '2012-09-15' and (
(mems.memid = 0 and bks.slots*facs.guestcost > 30) or
(mems.memid != 0 and bks.slots*facs.membercost > 30)
)
order by cost desc;
Why can't I refer to the cost
alias in the SELECT
list in the WHERE
clause?
If I run the same query with:
...
where
bks.starttime >= '2012-09-14' and
bks.starttime < '2012-09-15' and
cost > 30
order by cost desc;
an error occurs:
ERROR: column "cost" does not exist
It's clear with me from this answer that it's because of the order of evaluation. But why order by cost desc;
is allowed?
回答1:
You ask two questions:
1.
Why can't I refer to the SELECT cost alias at the WHERE clause?
2.
But why order by cost desc; is allowed?
The manual has an answer for both of them here:
An output column's name can be used to refer to the column's value in
ORDER BY
andGROUP BY
clauses, but not in theWHERE
orHAVING
clauses; there you must write out the expression instead.
It's defined by the SQL standard and the reason is the sequence of events in a SELECT
query. At the time WHERE
clauses are applied, output columns in the SELECT
list have not yet been computed. But when it comes to ORDER BY
, output columns are readily available.
So while this is inconvenient and confusing at first, it still kind of makes sense.
Related:
- PostgreSQL Where count condition
- Best way to get result count before LIMIT was applied
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38040631/postgresql-does-not-accept-column-alias-in-where-clause