I have two (private) feature branches that I'm working on.
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\ \
\ d -- e <-- Branch1
\
f -- g <-- Branch2
After working on these branches a little while I've discovered that I need the changes from Branch2 in Branch1. I'd like to rebase the changes in Branch2 onto Branch1. I'd like to end up with the following:
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\
d -- e -- f -- g <-- Branch1
I'm pretty sure I need to rebase the second branch onto the first, but I'm not entirely sure about the correct syntax and which branch I should have checked out.
Will this command produce the desired result?
(Branch1)$ git rebase --onto Branch1 Branch2
Switch to Branch2
git checkout Branch2
Apply the current (Branch2) changes on top of the Branch1 changes, staying in Branch2:
git rebase Branch1
Which would leave you with the desired result in Branch2:
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\
d -- e <-- Branch1
\
d -- e -- f' -- g' <-- Branch2
You can delete Branch1.
Note: if you were on Branch1
, you will with Git 2.0 (Q2 2014) be able to type:
git checkout Branch2
git rebase -
See commit 4f40740 by Brian Gesiak modocache
:
rebase
: allow "-
" short-hand for the previous branch
Teach rebase the same shorthand as
checkout
andmerge
to name the branch torebase
the current branch on; that is, that "-
" means "the branch we were previously on".
I know you asked to Rebase, but I'd Cherry-Pick the commits I wanted to move from Branch2 to Branch1 instead. That way, I wouldn't need to care about when which branch was created from master, and I'd have more control over the merging.
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\ \
\ d -- e -- f -- g <-- Branch1 (Cherry-Pick f & g)
\
f -- g <-- Branch2
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14893399/rebase-feature-branch-onto-another-feature-branch