问题
How can I make a big insertion with SqlBulkCopy from a List<> of simple object ?
Do I implement my custom IDataReader ?
回答1:
Simply create a DataTable from your list of objects and call SqlBulkCopy.WriteToServer
, passing the data table.
You might find the following useful:
- Adding columns to a DataTable. Add a column for each property/field you wish to write.
- Adding rows to a DataTable. Add a row for each object in your list.
For maximum performance with SqlBulkCopy, you should set an appropriate BatchSize. 10,000 seems to work well - but profile for your data.
You might also observe better results when using SqlBulkCopyOptions.TableLock.
An interesting and informative analysis of SqlBulkCopy performance can be found here.
回答2:
With FastMember, you can do this without ever needing to go via DataTable
(which, in my tests, more-than-doubles the performance):
using(var bcp = new SqlBulkCopy(connection))
using(var reader = ObjectReader.Create(data, "Id", "Name", "Description"))
{
bcp.DestinationTableName = "SomeTable";
bcp.WriteToServer(reader);
}
Note that ObjectReader
can also work with non-generic sources, and it is not necessary to specify the member-names in advance (although you probably want to use the ColumnMappings
aspect of SqlBulkCopy
if you don't specify them in the ObjectReader
itself).
回答3:
Late to the party, but if you add this EntityDataReader
class from Microsoft, there's an AsDataReader()
extension method that does exactly that: https://github.com/matthewschrager/Repository/blob/master/Repository.EntityFramework/EntityDataReader.cs
(example [List].AsDataReader()
implementation:)
var connStr = "";
using (var connection = new SqlConnection(connStr))
{
var startTime = DateTime.Now;
connection.Open();
var transaction = connection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
//var connStr = connection.ConnectionString;
using (var sbCopy = new SqlBulkCopy(connection, SqlBulkCopyOptions.Default, transaction))
{
sbCopy.BulkCopyTimeout = 0;
sbCopy.BatchSize = 10000;
sbCopy.DestinationTableName = "Foobars";
var reader = Foobars.AsDataReader();
sbCopy.WriteToServer(reader);
}
transaction.Commit();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
transaction.Rollback();
}
finally
{
transaction.Dispose();
connection.Close();
var endTime = DateTime.Now;
Console.WriteLine("Upload time elapsed: {0} seconds", (endTime - startTime).TotalSeconds);
}
}
回答4:
Depending on what you are trying to accomplish by calling SqlBulkCopy
in the first place, it might make more sense to use a Table-Valued Parameter (TVP). Using a TVP would make it trivial to send in a collection of any custom type. The data can be streamed in so you can avoid the DataTable
(much like in @Marc Gravell's answer) and you can avoid SqlBulkCopy
as well. TVP's allow for completely flexibility of how to handle the data once it gets to SQL Server as you call a Stored Procedure to pass the TVP data into and it appears as a Table Variable that you can do anything with, not just INSERT
(which is the case with SqlBulkCopy
). You can also get data back via a SqlDataReader
, data such as newly created IDENTITY
values. I added an example and some additional notes on this answer: How can I insert 10 million records in the shortest time possible?. And several years ago I wrote an article on SQL Server Central (free registration required), Streaming Data Into SQL Server 2008 From an Application, which is also noted in that linked answer, providing a working example of passing in a Generic List of a custom type, streamed in from a 3 million row text file.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3913371/sqlbulkcopy-from-a-list