问题
I have an app that currently uses NSURLConnection for the vast majority of its networking. I would like to move to NSURLSession because Apple tells me that is the way to go.
My app just uses the synchronous version of NSURLConnection by way of the + (NSData *)sendSynchronousRequest:(NSURLRequest *)request returningResponse:(NSURLResponse **)response error:(NSError **)error class method. I do this within a NSBlockOperation running on an NSOperationQueue so I am not needlessly blocking the main queue. The big advantage to doing things this way is that I can make the operations dependent on one another. For example, I can have the task that is requesting data be dependent on the login task finishing.
I have not seen any support for synchronous operations within NSURLSession. All I can find are articles deriding me for even thinking of using it synchronously and that I am a horrible person for blocking the threads. Fine. But I see no way to make NSURLSessionTasks dependent on each other. Is there a way to do that?
Or is there a description of how I would do such a thing in a different way?
回答1:
The harshest criticisms of synchronous network requests are reserved for those who do it from the main queue (as we know that one should never block the main queue). But you're doing it on your own background queue, which addresses the most egregious problem with synchronous requests. But you're losing some wonderful features that asynchronous techniques provide (e.g. cancelation of requests, if needed).
I'll answer your question (how to make NSURLSessionDataTask behave synchronously) below, but I'd really encourage you to embrace the asynchronous patterns rather than fighting them. I'd suggest refactoring your code to use asynchronous patterns. Specifically, if one task is dependent upon another, simply put the initiation of the dependent task in the completion handler of the prior task.
If you have problems in that conversion, then post another Stack Overflow question, showing us what you tried, and we can try to help you out.
If you want to make an asynchronous operation synchronous, a common pattern is to use a dispatch semaphore so your thread that initiated the asynchronous process can wait for a signal from the completion block of the asynchronous operation before continuing. Never do this from the main queue, but if you're doing this from some background queue, it can be a useful pattern.
You can create a semaphore with:
dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore = dispatch_semaphore_create(0);
You can then have the completion block of the asynchronous process signal the semaphore with:
dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);
And you can then have the code outside of the completion block (but still on the background queue, not the main queue) wait for that signal:
dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
So, with NSURLSessionDataTask, putting that all together, that might look like:
[queue addOperationWithBlock:^{
dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore = dispatch_semaphore_create(0);
NSURLSession *session = [NSURLSession sharedSession]; // or create your own session with your own NSURLSessionConfiguration
NSURLSessionTask *task = [session dataTaskWithURL:url completionHandler:^(NSData *data, NSURLResponse *response, NSError *error) {
if (data) {
// do whatever you want with the data here
} else {
NSLog(@"error = %@", error);
}
dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);
}];
[task resume];
// but have the thread wait until the task is done
dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
// now carry on with other stuff contingent upon what you did above
]);
With NSURLConnection (now deprecated), you have to jump through some hoops to initiate requests from a background queue, but NSURLSession handles it gracefully.
Having said that, using block operations like this means that the operations won't respond to cancellation events (while they're running, at least). So I generally eschew this semaphore technique with block operations and just wrap the data tasks in asynchronous NSOperation subclass. Then you enjoy the benefits of operations, but you can make them cancelable, too. It's more work, but a much better pattern.
For example:
//
// DataTaskOperation.h
//
// Created by Robert Ryan on 12/12/15.
// Copyright © 2015 Robert Ryan. All rights reserved.
//
@import Foundation;
#import "AsynchronousOperation.h"
NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN
@interface DataTaskOperation : AsynchronousOperation
/// Creates a operation that retrieves the contents of a URL based on the specified URL request object, and calls a handler upon completion.
///
/// @param request A NSURLRequest object that provides the URL, cache policy, request type, body data or body stream, and so on.
/// @param dataTaskCompletionHandler The completion handler to call when the load request is complete. This handler is executed on the delegate queue. This completion handler takes the following parameters:
///
/// @returns The new session data operation.
- (instancetype)initWithRequest:(NSURLRequest *)request dataTaskCompletionHandler:(void (^)(NSData * _Nullable data, NSURLResponse * _Nullable response, NSError * _Nullable error))dataTaskCompletionHandler;
/// Creates a operation that retrieves the contents of a URL based on the specified URL request object, and calls a handler upon completion.
///
/// @param url A NSURL object that provides the URL, cache policy, request type, body data or body stream, and so on.
/// @param dataTaskCompletionHandler The completion handler to call when the load request is complete. This handler is executed on the delegate queue. This completion handler takes the following parameters:
///
/// @returns The new session data operation.
- (instancetype)initWithURL:(NSURL *)url dataTaskCompletionHandler:(void (^)(NSData * _Nullable data, NSURLResponse * _Nullable response, NSError * _Nullable error))dataTaskCompletionHandler;
@end
NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_END
and
//
// DataTaskOperation.m
//
// Created by Robert Ryan on 12/12/15.
// Copyright © 2015 Robert Ryan. All rights reserved.
//
#import "DataTaskOperation.h"
@interface DataTaskOperation ()
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSURLRequest *request;
@property (nonatomic, weak) NSURLSessionTask *task;
@property (nonatomic, copy) void (^dataTaskCompletionHandler)(NSData * _Nullable data, NSURLResponse * _Nullable response, NSError * _Nullable error);
@end
@implementation DataTaskOperation
- (instancetype)initWithRequest:(NSURLRequest *)request dataTaskCompletionHandler:(void (^)(NSData * _Nullable data, NSURLResponse * _Nullable response, NSError * _Nullable error))dataTaskCompletionHandler {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
self.request = request;
self.dataTaskCompletionHandler = dataTaskCompletionHandler;
}
return self;
}
- (instancetype)initWithURL:(NSURL *)url dataTaskCompletionHandler:(void (^)(NSData * _Nullable data, NSURLResponse * _Nullable response, NSError * _Nullable error))dataTaskCompletionHandler {
NSURLRequest *request = [NSURLRequest requestWithURL:url];
return [self initWithRequest:request dataTaskCompletionHandler:dataTaskCompletionHandler];
}
- (void)main {
NSURLSessionTask *task = [[NSURLSession sharedSession] dataTaskWithRequest:self.request completionHandler:^(NSData *data, NSURLResponse *response, NSError *error) {
self.dataTaskCompletionHandler(data, response, error);
[self completeOperation];
}];
[task resume];
self.task = task;
}
- (void)completeOperation {
self.dataTaskCompletionHandler = nil;
[super completeOperation];
}
- (void)cancel {
[self.task cancel];
[super cancel];
}
@end
Where:
//
// AsynchronousOperation.h
//
@import Foundation;
@interface AsynchronousOperation : NSOperation
/// Complete the asynchronous operation.
///
/// This also triggers the necessary KVO to support asynchronous operations.
- (void)completeOperation;
@end
And
//
// AsynchronousOperation.m
//
#import "AsynchronousOperation.h"
@interface AsynchronousOperation ()
@property (nonatomic, getter = isFinished, readwrite) BOOL finished;
@property (nonatomic, getter = isExecuting, readwrite) BOOL executing;
@end
@implementation AsynchronousOperation
@synthesize finished = _finished;
@synthesize executing = _executing;
- (instancetype)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
_finished = NO;
_executing = NO;
}
return self;
}
- (void)start {
if ([self isCancelled]) {
self.finished = YES;
return;
}
self.executing = YES;
[self main];
}
- (void)completeOperation {
self.executing = NO;
self.finished = YES;
}
#pragma mark - NSOperation methods
- (BOOL)isAsynchronous {
return YES;
}
- (BOOL)isExecuting {
@synchronized(self) {
return _executing;
}
}
- (BOOL)isFinished {
@synchronized(self) {
return _finished;
}
}
- (void)setExecuting:(BOOL)executing {
@synchronized(self) {
if (_executing != executing) {
[self willChangeValueForKey:@"isExecuting"];
_executing = executing;
[self didChangeValueForKey:@"isExecuting"];
}
}
}
- (void)setFinished:(BOOL)finished {
@synchronized(self) {
if (_finished != finished) {
[self willChangeValueForKey:@"isFinished"];
_finished = finished;
[self didChangeValueForKey:@"isFinished"];
}
}
}
@end
回答2:
@Rob I would encourage you to post your reply as a solution, in view of the following documentation note from NSURLSession.dataTaskWithURL(_:completionHandler:):
This method is intended as an alternative to the sendAsynchronousRequest:queue:completionHandler: method of NSURLConnection, with the added ability to support custom authentication and cancellation.
回答3:
If semaphore based approach doesn't work, try polling based approach.
var reply = Data()
/// We need to make a session object.
/// This is key to make this work. This won't work with shared session.
let conf = URLSessionConfiguration.ephemeral
let sess = URLSession(configuration: conf)
let task = sess.dataTask(with: u) { data, _, _ in
reply = data ?? Data()
}
task.resume()
while task.state != .completed {
Thread.sleep(forTimeInterval: 0.1)
}
FileHandle.standardOutput.write(reply)
Polling based approach works very reliably, but effectively limits maximum throughput to polling interval. In this example, it's been limited to 10 times/sec.
- I made a Swift package for this.
Semaphore based approach has been worked well so far, but since Xcode 11 era, it's getting broken. (maybe only for me?)
A data task does not finish if I wait for semaphores. If I wait for semaphore on different thread, it task fails with an error.
nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata [C2] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata on unconnected nw_connection error.
It seems something has been changed in the implementation as Apple is moving Network.framework.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21198404/nsurlsession-with-nsblockoperation-and-queues