问题
Currently, with rspec-rails (2.14.2), I test my associations in model specs with the shoulda (3.5.0) gem like so:
# app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :school
end
# spec/models/user_spec.rb
describe User do
it { should belong_to :school }
end
After some research, I hit a wall trying to make association-related assertions work (they all seem to fail).
Error message:
1) User
Failure/Error: it { is_expected.to belong_to :school }
NoMethodError:
undefined method `belong_to' for #<RSpec::ExampleGroups::School:0x007f8a4c7a68d0>
# ./spec/models/user.rb:4:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
So my questions are:
- Can you test associations without the shoulda gem? This doesn't seem possible based on what I've seen with the "expect" syntax.
- Does the shoulda gem break with rspec 3.0.1 for everyone? Is there a workaround?
回答1:
shoulda-matchers is the gem that provides association, validation, and other matchers.
The shoulda gem (which we also make) is for using shoulda-matchers with Test::Unit (and also provides some nice things like contexts and the ability to use strings as test names). But if you're on RSpec, you'll want to use shoulda-matchers, not shoulda.
回答2:
This is the way it works, now with the shoulda-matchers gem and the "expect" syntax
describe User, type: :model do
it { is_expected.to belong_to :school }
end
回答3:
I do not believe you need the gem for the basic associations.
You might be having an issues if you haven't actually assigned your user to your school. You need to populate the foreign key, not just use the relationship without having done that.
So you may need to do
@school = School.new
@user = User.new
@school.users << @user
it { should belong_to :school } # within the user block
or
expect(@user).to belong_to @school
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24029606/testing-associations-with-rspec-rails-3-0-1-and-shoulda-doesnt-work