Generics with autoboxing and unboxing of primitives

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-14 03:37:35

问题


Why autoboxing and unboxing of primitives not happens with Generics Java.

public static <T extends Number> T addNumber(T a , T b)
{
  int c = a*b;
  System.out.println(c);
  return c; 
}

Here why * operation can't be performed and why can't return c.Any help would be appreciable.


回答1:


Generics are not supposed to be used with primitive types. T indicates a type parameter which should be an object.
More reference
Why don't Java Generics support primitive types? Java Generics ? , E and T what is the difference?
Restrictions on generics




回答2:


int c = a*b;

This statement actually works, since T is bounded by Integer, so after erasure, the types of a and b are Integer and they are unboxed to int.

return c;

This doesn't work since the return type of the method is not Integer, it is T, and even though <T extends Integer> and Integer is final, so T can only be Integer, the compiler doesn't allow that, since it doesn't take the finality of the type bound into account (i.e. as far as it's concerned, the method can accept instances of a sub-class of the type bound, and it can't auto-box int to any sub-class of the type bound).

Changing the return type to Integer will make the code pass compilation :

public static <T extends Integer> Integer addNumber(T a , T b){
  int c = a*b;
  System.out.println(c);
  return c;
}

Of course, it doesn't make sense to use Integer (or any final class) as a type bound for a generic type parameter.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38473232/generics-with-autoboxing-and-unboxing-of-primitives

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!