问题
I have a report which on execution connects to the database with my_report_user username. There can be many end-users of the report. And in each execution a new connection to the database will be made with my_report_user (there is no connection pooling)
I have a result set which I think can just be created once (may be on the first run of the report) and other report executions can just reuse that stuff. Basically each report execution should check whether this result set (stored as temp table) exists or not. If it does not exist then create that result set else just reuse whats available.
Should I use local temp tables (#) or global temp tables (##)?
Has anyone tried such stuff and if yes, please let me know what all things should I care about? (Almost simultaneous report runs, etc.)
EDIT: I am using Sql-Server 2005
回答1:
Neither
If you want to cache result result sets under your own control, then you cannot use temp tables, of any kind. You should use ordinary user tables, stored either in tempdb or even have your own result set cache database.
Temp tables, bot #local and ##shared have a lifetime controlled by the connection(s). If your application disconnect, the temp table is deleted, and this does not work well with what you describe.
The real difficult prolem will be to populate these cached result sets under concurent runs without mixing things up (end up with result sets containing duplicate items from concurent report runs that both believed are the 'first' run).
As a side note SQL Server Reporting Services already does this out-of-the-box. You can cache and share datasets, you can cache and share reports, it already works and was tested for you.
回答2:
I find #temp tables can be useful in certain scenarios, but not as a best practice. I have yet to find a valid use for global ##temp tables, either in my own work, or in the work of anyone else who has written about them. The only case I can think of is BCP or other external process which needs to build a temporary data store and then retrieve it in some subsequent step. In that case I would prefer to use a permanent table with some kind of key and a background process to handle cleanup.
回答3:
It sounds like you are getting into an OLTP mode now. Reading up on database warehousing will definitely help you.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1596203/local-vs-global-temp-tables-when-to-use-what