I tried to play with the C++17 standard. I tried to use one of the features of C++17 if constexpr
. And I had a problem... Please take a look at the following code. This compiles without errors. In the following code, I tried to use if constexpr
to check if it is a pointer.
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
void print(T value)
{
if constexpr (std::is_pointer_v<decltype(value)>)
std::cout << "Ptr to " << *value << std::endl; // Ok
else
std::cout << "Ref to " << value << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
auto n = 1000;
print(n);
print(&n);
}
But when I rewrite the above code, as shown below, where if constexpr
is in the main
function:
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
int main()
{
auto value = 100;
if constexpr (std::is_pointer_v<decltype(value)>)
std::cout << "Ptr to " << *value << std::endl; // Error
else
std::cout << "Ref to " << value << std::endl;
}
I get a compilation error:
main.cpp:8:32: error: invalid type argument of unary ‘*’ (have ‘int’) std::cout << "Ptr to " << *value << std::endl;
Problem is not in the main function. This can be any function similar to the following.
void print()
{
auto value = 100;
if constexpr (std::is_pointer_v<decltype(value)>)
std::cout << "Ptr to " << *value << std::endl; // Error
else
std::cout << "Ref to " << value << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
print();
}
I would like to know why if constexpr
works only in template functions, even if the type is deduced by the decltype from the input parameter.
I would like to know why "
if constexpr
" works only in template functions, even if the type is deduced by thedecltype
from the input parameter.
This is by design.
if constexpr
will not instantiate the branch not taken if it's within a template. It won't just treat the branch not taken as token soup and avoid parsing it or performing semantic analysis entirely. Both sides are still going to be analyzed, and since *value
is ill-formed for int
s, that's an error.
You simply can't use if constexpr
to avoid compiling non-template code. It's only to avoid instantiating template code that's potentially invalid-for-the-particular-specialization.
C++ standard, clause 9.4.1:
If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of the condition shall be a contextually converted constant expression of type bool (8.6); this form is called a constexpr if statement. If the value of the converted condition is false, the first substatement is a discarded statement, otherwise the second substatement, if present, is a discarded statement. During the instantiation of an enclosing templated entity (Clause 17), if the condition is not value-dependent after its instantiation, the discarded substatement (if any) is not instantiated.
(emphasis mine)
So, a substatement of a constexpr if
still gets instantiated if it is not inside a template, thus it must at least compile.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50051473/if-constexpr-in-c17-does-not-work-in-a-non-templated-function