问题
I have a knowledgebase that looks something like this
fact1(1, _, a, _, _).
fact1(2, _, c, _, _).
fact1(3, _, d, _, _).
fact1(4, _, f, _, _).
fact2(_, 1, b, _, _).
fact2(_, 2, c, _, _).
fact2(_, 4, e, _, _).
For every fact1
& fact2
, where (in this example) the numbers match up, I want to have a list of the corresponding letters as tuples.
I would like to use findall/3
and only one predicate for this.
I have asked a question here before on how to solve something similar, where the answer was using two predicates. That solution looked like this:
find_item((Val1,Val2)):-
fact1(A, _, Val1, _, _),
fact2(_, A, Val2, _, _).`
test(Items) :-
findall(Item,find_item(Item),Items).
The result for the given example of facts, should look like this:
[(a, b), (c, c), (f, e)]
Can the two predicates be combined using just findall/3?
回答1:
You can inline procedure find_item/1
as the goal of findall/3 (use a conjunction of goals instead of a single goal):
test(Items):-
findall((Val1, Val2), (fact1(A, _, Val1, _, _), fact2(_, A, Val2, _, _)), Items).
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55633243/how-to-inline-a-goal-with-findall-3-use-just-one-predicate