Problems with static local variables with relocatable code

问题

I am building a project which has relocatable code on bare metal. It is a Cortex M3 embedded application. I do not have a dynamic linker and have implemented all the relocations in my startup code.

Mostly it is working but my local static variables appear to be incorrectly located. Their address is offset by the amount that my executable is offset in memory - ie I compile my code as if it is loaded at memory location 0 but I actually load it in memory located at 0x8000. The static local variable have their memory address offset by 0x8000 which is not good.

My global variables are located properly by the GOT but the static local variables are not in the GOT at all (at least they don't appear when I run readelf -r). I am compiling my code with -fpic and the linker has -fpic and -pie specified. I think I must be missing a compile and/or link option to either instruct gcc to use the GOT for the static local variables or to instruct it to use absolute addressing for them.

It seems that currently the code adds the PC to the location of the static local variables.

回答1:

I think I have repeated what you are seeing:

statloc.c

unsigned int glob;

unsigned int fun ( unsigned int a )
{
    static unsigned int loc;

    if(a==0) loc=7;
    return(a+glob+loc);
}

arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -mcpu=cortex-m3 -Wall -Werror -O2 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -ffreestanding -mthumb -fpic -pie -S statloc.c

Which gives:

    .cpu cortex-m3
    .fpu softvfp
    .thumb
    .text
    .align  2
    .global fun
    .thumb
    .thumb_func
fun:
    ldr r3, .L6
.LPIC2:
    add r3, pc
    cbnz    r0, .L5
    ldr r1, .L6+4
    movs    r2, #7
.LPIC1:
    add r1, pc
    ldr ip, .L6+8
    str r2, [r1, #0]
    ldr r1, [r3, ip]
    ldr r3, [r1, #0]
    adds    r0, r0, r3
    adds    r0, r0, r2
    bx  lr
.L5:
    ldr ip, .L6+8
    ldr r2, .L6+12
    ldr r1, [r3, ip]
.LPIC0:
    add r2, pc
    ldr r2, [r2]
    ldr r3, [r1, #0]
    adds    r0, r0, r3
    adds    r0, r0, r2
    bx  lr
.L7:
    .align  2
.L6:
    .word   _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-(.LPIC2+4)
    .word   .LANCHOR0-(.LPIC1+4)
    .word   glob(GOT)
    .word   .LANCHOR0-(.LPIC0+4)
    .size   fun, .-fun
    .comm   glob,4,4
    .bss
    .align  2
.LANCHOR0 = . + 0
    .type   loc.823, %object
    .size   loc.823, 4
loc.823:
    .space  4

I also added startup code and compiled a binary and disassembled to further understand/verify what is going on.

this is the offset from the pc to the .got
    ldr r3, .L6  
add pc so r3 holds a position independent offset to the .got
    add r3, pc   
offset in the got for the address of the glob 
    ldr ip, .L6+8 
read the absolute address for the global variable from the got
    ldr r1, [r3, ip] 
finally read the global variable into r3
    ldr r3, [r1, #0] 


this is the offset from the pc to the static local in .bss
    ldr r2, .L6+12
add pc so that r2 holds a position independent offset to the static local
in .bss    
    add r2, pc
read the static local in .bss    
    ldr r2, [r2]

So if you were to change where .text is loaded and were to change where both .got and .bss are loaded relative to .text and that is it then the contents of .got would be wrong and the global variable would be loaded from the wrong place.

if you were to change where .text is loaded, leave .bss where the linker put it and move .got relative to .text. then the global would be pulled from the right place and the local would not

if you were to change where .text is loaded, change where both .got and .bss are loaded relative to .text and modify .got contents to reflect where .text is loaded, then both the local and global variable would be accessed from the right place.

So the loader and gcc/ld need to all be in sync. My immediate recommendation is to not use a static local and just use a global. That or dont worry about position independent code, it is a cortex-m3 after all and somewhat resource limited, just define the memory map up front. I assume the question is how do I make gcc use the .got for the local global, and that one I dont know the answer to, but taking a simple example like the one above you can work through the many command line options until you find one that changes the output.

回答2:

This problem is also discussed here: https://answers.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+question/236744

Starting with gcc 4.8 (ARM), there's a command line switch called -mpic-data-is-text-relative which causes static variables being addressed through the GOT as well.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5093851/problems-with-static-local-variables-with-relocatable-code

标签

arm

static-variables

relocation

fpic