Is va_start required in variadic arguments for functions?

问题

I'm reading the text The Linux Programming Interface and they show this function to handle errors. In the man pages (man stdarg) it says va_start must be called first to initialize ap for use by va_arg() and va_end.

So why in this function there is no va_start?

static void
outputError(Boolean useErr, int err, Boolean flushStdout,
        const char *format, va_list ap) 
{
#define BUF_SIZE 500
    char buf[BUF_SIZE], userMsg[BUF_SIZE], errText[BUF_SIZE];

    vsnprintf(userMsg, BUF_SIZE, format, ap);

    if (useErr)                                                                               
        snprintf(errText, BUF_SIZE, " [%s %s]",
                (err > 0 && err <= MAX_ENAME) ?
                ename[err] : "?UNKNOWN?", strerror(err));
    else
        snprintf(errText, BUF_SIZE, ":");

    snprintf(buf, BUF_SIZE, "ERROR%s %s\n", errText, userMsg);

    if (flushStdout)
        fflush(stdout);       /* Flush any pending stdout */
    fputs(buf, stderr);
    fflush(stderr);           /* In case stderr is not line-buffered */
}

回答1:

va_list ap is passed as argument to the function outputError(), it must be initialized by va_start in the caller of outputError() (or caller of caller, etc).

To answer your main question, yes, va_start is required, but not necessarily in the current function where vp_list is used. The same for va_end.

回答2:

So why in this function there is no va_start?

Here is one of the places that outputError() is used:

void
errMsg(const char *format, ...)
{
    va_list argList;
    int savedErrno;
    savedErrno = errno;
    /* In case we change it here */
    va_start(argList, format);
    outputError(TRUE, errno, TRUE, format, argList);
    va_end(argList);
    errno = savedErrno;
}

I think this answered your question clearly.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22703657/is-va-start-required-in-variadic-arguments-for-functions

标签

variadic-functions

variadic-macros