问题
Has anyone had problems with the Weibull distribution using the ExtDist Package?
From the documentation:
Parameter Estimation for a distribution with unknown shape parameters Example from: Rinne (2009) Dataset p.338 and example pp.418-419 Parameter estimates are given as shape = 99.2079 and scale = 2.5957. The log-likelihood for this data and Rinne's parameter estimates is -1163.278.
data <- c(35,38,42,56,58,61,63,76,81,83,86,90,99,104,113,114,117,119,141,183)
est.par <- eWeibull(X=data, method="numerical.MLE"); est.par
plot(est.par)
However when I run this I get the following output:
Parameters for the Weibull distribution.
(found using the numerical.MLE method.)
Parameter Type Estimate S.E.
shape shape 5.82976007 1.79326460
scale scale 0.06628166 0.02129258
This is clearly wrong but I am not sure if I have made a mistake or if there is a bug in the package?
回答1:
It seems to me it's a bug in the package. I did my own independent MLE and got the same answer as Rinne:
library(bbmle)
m1 <- mle2(y~dweibull(shape=exp(lshape),scale=exp(lscale)),
data=data.frame(y=data),
start=list(lshape=0,lscale=0))
Then I dug in and looked at the source of the dWeibull
function:
function (x, shape = 2, scale = 2, params = list(shape = 2, scale = 2))
{
if (!missing(params)) {
shape <- params$shape
scale <- params$scale
}
out = stats::dgamma(x, shape, scale)
return(out)
}
It seems that out
should be set to the result of dweibull(...)
rather than dgamma(...)
... ?? Looking at the rest of the weibull code, this error seems to be repeated -- maybe this is just a sloppy cut-and-paste? I would definitely contact the maintainer (maintainer("ExtDist")
).
PS. If I fit a Gamma distribution using my alternative method I get exactly the same answers as the ExtDist
package:
m1g <- mle2(y~dgamma(shape=exp(lshape),rate=exp(lrate)),
data=data.frame(y=data),
start=list(lshape=0,lrate=0))
exp(coef(m1g))
## lshape lrate
## 5.82976007 0.06628166
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45208176/the-weibull-distribution-in-r-extdist