问题
As this uses a sigmoid function instead of a zero/one activation function I guess this is the right way to calculate gradient descent, is that right?
static double calculateOutput( int theta, double weights[], double[][] feature_matrix, int file_index, int globo_dict_size )
{
//double sum = x * weights[0] + y * weights[1] + z * weights[2] + weights[3];
double sum = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < globo_dict_size; i++)
{
sum += ( weights[i] * feature_matrix[file_index][i] );
}
//bias
sum += weights[ globo_dict_size ];
return sigmoid(sum);
}
private static double sigmoid(double x)
{
return 1 / (1 + Math.exp(-x));
}
This following code where I'm trying up update my Θ values, (equivalent to weights in perceptron, isn't it?), I was given this formula LEARNING_RATE * localError * feature_matrix__train[p][i] * output_gradient[i]
for that purpose in my related question. I commented out the weight update from my perceptron.
Is this new update rule the correct approach?
What is meant by output_gradient? Is that equivalent to the sum I calculate in my calculateOutput
method?
//LEARNING WEIGHTS
double localError, globalError;
int p, iteration, output;
iteration = 0;
do
{
iteration++;
globalError = 0;
//loop through all instances (complete one epoch)
for (p = 0; p < number_of_files__train; p++)
{
// calculate predicted class
output = calculateOutput( theta, weights, feature_matrix__train, p, globo_dict_size );
// difference between predicted and actual class values
localError = outputs__train[p] - output;
//update weights and bias
for (int i = 0; i < globo_dict_size; i++)
{
//weights[i] += ( LEARNING_RATE * localError * feature_matrix__train[p][i] );
weights[i] += LEARNING_RATE * localError * feature_matrix__train[p][i] * output_gradient[i]
}
weights[ globo_dict_size ] += ( LEARNING_RATE * localError );
//summation of squared error (error value for all instances)
globalError += (localError*localError);
}
/* Root Mean Squared Error */
if (iteration < 10)
System.out.println("Iteration 0" + iteration + " : RMSE = " + Math.sqrt( globalError/number_of_files__train ) );
else
System.out.println("Iteration " + iteration + " : RMSE = " + Math.sqrt( globalError/number_of_files__train ) );
//System.out.println( Arrays.toString( weights ) );
}
while(globalError != 0 && iteration<=MAX_ITER);
UPDATE Now I've updated things, looks more like this:
double loss, cost, hypothesis, gradient;
int p, iteration;
iteration = 0;
do
{
iteration++;
cost = 0.0;
loss = 0.0;
//loop through all instances (complete one epoch)
for (p = 0; p < number_of_files__train; p++)
{
// 1. Calculate the hypothesis h = X * theta
hypothesis = calculateHypothesis( theta, feature_matrix__train, p, globo_dict_size );
// 2. Calculate the loss = h - y and maybe the squared cost (loss^2)/2m
loss = hypothesis - outputs__train[p];
// 3. Calculate the gradient = X' * loss / m
gradient = calculateGradent( theta, feature_matrix__train, p, globo_dict_size, loss );
// 4. Update the parameters theta = theta - alpha * gradient
for (int i = 0; i < globo_dict_size; i++)
{
theta[i] = theta[i] - (LEARNING_RATE * gradient);
}
}
//summation of squared error (error value for all instances)
cost += (loss*loss);
/* Root Mean Squared Error */
if (iteration < 10)
System.out.println("Iteration 0" + iteration + " : RMSE = " + Math.sqrt( cost/number_of_files__train ) );
else
System.out.println("Iteration " + iteration + " : RMSE = " + Math.sqrt( cost/number_of_files__train ) );
//System.out.println( Arrays.toString( weights ) );
}
while(cost != 0 && iteration<=MAX_ITER);
}
static double calculateHypothesis( double theta[], double[][] feature_matrix, int file_index, int globo_dict_size )
{
double hypothesis = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < globo_dict_size; i++)
{
hypothesis += ( theta[i] * feature_matrix[file_index][i] );
}
//bias
hypothesis += theta[ globo_dict_size ];
return hypothesis;
}
static double calculateGradent( double theta[], double[][] feature_matrix, int file_index, int globo_dict_size, double loss )
{
double gradient = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < globo_dict_size; i++)
{
gradient += ( feature_matrix[file_index][i] * loss);
}
return gradient;
}
public static double hingeLoss()
{
// l(y, f(x)) = max(0, 1 − y · f(x))
return HINGE;
}
回答1:
Your calculateOutput
method looks correct. Your next piece of code I don't really think so:
weights[i] += LEARNING_RATE * localError * feature_matrix__train[p][i] * output_gradient[i]
Look at the image you posted in your other question:
Let's try to identify each part of these rules in your code.
Theta0 and
Theta1: looks likeweights[i]
in your code; I hopeglobo_dict_size = 2
;alpha
: seems to be yourLEARNING_RATE
;1 / m
: I can't find this anywhere in your update rule.m
is the number of training instances in Andrew Ng's videos. In your case, it should be1 / number_of_files__train
I think; It's not very important though, things should work well even without it.The sum: you do this with the
calculateOutput
function, whose result you make use of in thelocalError
variable, which you multiply byfeature_matrix__train[p][i]
(equivalent tox(i)
in Andrew Ng's notation).This part is your partial derivative, and part of the gradient!
Why? Because the partial derivative of
[h_theta(x(i)) - y(i)]^2
with respect toTheta0
is equal to:2*[h_theta(x(i)) - y(i)] * derivative[h_theta(x(i)) - y(i)] derivative[h_theta(x(i)) - y(i)] = derivative[Theta0 * x(i, 1) + Theta1*x(i, 2) - y(i)] = x(i, 1)
Of course, you should derive the entire sum. This is also why Andrew Ng used
1 / (2m)
for the cost function, so the2
would cancel out with the2
we get from derivation.Remember that
x(i, 1)
, or justx(1)
should consist of all ones. In your code, you should make sure that:feature_matrix__train[p][0] == 1
That's it! I don't know what
output_gradient[i]
is supposed to be in your code, you don't define it anywhere.
I suggest you take a look at this tutorial to get a better understanding of the algorithm you have used. Since you use the sigmoid function, it seems like you want to do classification, but then you should use a different cost function. That document deals with logistic regression as well.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28923292/calculate-gradient-output-for-theta-update-rule