问题
The are two different way to implement it.
One is more short
implicit def toR1(s:String) = new { def getLength = s.length)}
Second is more long
class R2(s:String){def getLength2 = s.length)}
implicit def toR2(s:String) = new R2(s)
Which one is better?
回答1:
The first version uses a structural type. It makes it possible to write short and readable code, but a disadvantage of structural types is that reflection is used at runtime when you call the method in the structural type. Calling a method via reflection is slower than calling a method directly.
More details are in this blog post (written by me): Avoid structural types when pimping libraries
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9402218/what-is-the-best-way-to-use-enrich-my-library-in-scala