问题
I'm on Visual Studio 2013 and I'm seeing what I think is a bug, I was hoping someone could confirm?
string foo{ "A\nB\rC\n\r" };
vector<string> bar;
for (sregex_iterator i(foo.cbegin(), foo.cend(), regex("(.*)[\n\r]{1,2}")); i != sregex_iterator(); ++i){
bar.push_back(i->operator[](1).str());
}
This code hits a Debug Assertion in the Visual Studio regex library:
regex_iterator
orphaned
If I define the regex
outside the for
-loop it's fine:
string foo{ "A\nB\rC\n\r" };
vector<string> bar;
regex bug("(.*)[\n\r]{1,2}");
for (sregex_iterator i(foo.cbegin(), foo.cend(), bug); i != sregex_iterator(); ++i){
bar.push_back(i->operator[](1).str());
}
Alternatively this works fine in a transform as shown in this question:
string foo{ "A\nB\rC\n\r" };
vector<string> bar;
// This puts {"A", "B", "C"} into bar
transform(sregex_iterator(foo.cbegin(), foo.cend(), regex("(.*)[\n\r]{1,2}")), sregex_iterator(), back_inserter(bar), [](const smatch& i){ return i[1].str(); });
Can someone confirm this is a bug?
回答1:
In C++11 you are allowed to bind a temporary regex
to const regex &
which can lead to undefined behavior if the iterator is used outside of the lifetime of the temporary since it will store a pointer to it. This is a defect in the specification and it is not an error, although Visual Studio catches this with a debug assert.
sregex_iterator i(foo.cbegin(), foo.cend(), regex("(.*)[\n\r]{1,2}"))
^^^^^
temporary
The following deleted overload was adding in C++14 to prevent this case, from cppreference:
regex_iterator(BidirIt, BidirIt,
const regex_type&&,
std::regex_constants::match_flag_type =
std::regex_constants::match_default) = delete; (since C++14)
and it says:
The overload 2 is not allowed to be called with a temporary regex, since the returned iterator would be immediately invalidated.
So this is not a Visual Studio
bug since it is implementing the C++11 standard and this was not addressed via a defect report till later on. Both clang
and gcc
using -std=c++14
or greater will produce an error with your first(see it live) and third(see it live) example. Visual Studio only started supporting some C++14 in VS 2015:
[...]and initial support for certain C++14 features.[...]
We can see that LWG defect 2332: regex_iterator/regex_token_iterator should forbid temporary regexes deals with this:
Users can write "for(sregex_iterator i(s.begin(), s.end(), regex("meow")), end; i != end; ++i)", binding a temporary regex to const regex& and storing a pointer to it. This will compile silently, triggering undefined behavior at runtime. We now have the technology to prevent this from compiling, like how reference_wrapper refuses to bind to temporaries.
As T.C. points out the last example you show is actually ok, even though you are binding a temporary its lifetime extends to the end of the expression.
回答2:
No, this is not a bug. See LWG 2329 regex_match()/regex_search() with match_results should forbid temporary strings. This construct exhibits undefined behavior since it binds a temporary regex to const regex& and stores a pointer to it.
Also see C++14 STL Features, Fixes, And Breaking Changes In Visual Studio 14 CTP1 where this is listed as a fix.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29895747/visual-studio-regex-iterator-bug