问题
I am a newbie to Haskell programming and have trouble understanding how the below list comprehension expands.
primes = sieve [2..]
sieve (p:xs) = p : sieve [x | x <-xs, x `mod` p /= 0]
Can someone correct me how the sieve
expansion works:
- As we are pattern matching in
sieve
,p
would associate to2
andx
s from[3..]
. - Next, in the list comprehension
x<-3
, but then how can we call sieve with just3
when there is no short-circuit.
Other thing I do not understand is how recursion works here.
I think it would be clear if one could expand the above one step at a time for first few numbers, say until 5
.
回答1:
Let's do some equational reasoning.
primes = sieve [2..]
sieve (p:xs) = p : sieve [x | x <- xs, x `mod` p /= 0]
The [2..]
is sintactic sugar for [2, 3, 4, 5, ...]
so
primes = sieve [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...]
Inline sieve
once:
primes = 2 : sieve [x | x <- [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ...], x `mod` 2 /= 0]
First, x
gets value 3
which passes the mod 2
filter
primes = 2 : sieve (3 : [x | x <- [4, 5, 6, 7, ...], x `mod` 2 /= 0])
Inline sieve
again (I renamed x
to y
to prevent confusions)
primes = 2 : 3 : sieve [y | y <- [x | x <- [4, 5, 6, 7, ...], x `mod` 2 /= 0],
y `mod` 3 /= 0]
Now x = 4
fails the mod 2
filter but x = 5
passes it. So
primes = 2 : 3 : sieve [y | y <- 5 : [x | x <- [6, 7, 8, ...], x `mod` 2 /= 0],
y `mod` 3 /= 0]
This y = 5
also passes the mod 3
filter so now we have
primes = 2 : 3 : sieve (5 : [y | y <- [x | x <- [6, 7, 8, ...], x `mod` 2 /= 0],
y `mod` 3 /= 0])
Expanding sieve
one more time (z
instead of y
) gets us to
primes = 2 : 3 : 5 : sieve [z | z <- [y | y <- [x | x <- [6, 7, 8, ...],
x `mod` 2 /= 0],
y `mod` 3 /= 0],
z `mod` 5 /= 0]
And the expansion continues on the same way.
回答2:
Here is an operational description of what sieve
does.
To compute sieve (x:xs)
:
- Emit the leading element
x
. - From the tail
xs
, letys
be the listxs
with all of the multiples ofx
removed. - To generate the next element, recursively call
sieve
onys
defined in step 2.
Here is how the first couple of terms are computed:
sieve [2..]
= sieve (2:[3..]) -- x = 2, xs = [3..]
= 2 : sieve ys
where ys = [3..] with all of the multiples of 2 removed
= [3,5,7,9,...]
= 2 : sieve [3,5,7,9,...]
and then:
sieve [3,5,7,9,...] -- x = 3, xs = [5,7,9,11,...]
= 3 : sieve ys
where ys = [5,7,9,11,13,15,17,...] with all of the multiples of 3 removed
= [5,7, 11,13, 17,...]
= 3 : sieve [5,7,11,13,17,...]
and then:
sieve [5,7,11,13,17,...] -- x = 5, xs = [7,11,13,17..]
= 5 : sieve ys
where ys = [7, 11,13, 17,19,...] with all of the multiples of 5 removed
= [7, 11,13, 17,19,...] (the first one will be 25, then 35,...)
= 5 : sieve [7,11,13,17,19,...]
etc.
回答3:
Using an auxiliary function
transform (p:xs) = [x | x <- xs, mod x p /= 0]
= filter (\x-> mod x p /= 0) xs -- remove all multiples of p
= xs >>= noMult p -- feed xs through a tester
-- where
noMult p x = [x | rem x p > 0] -- keep x if not multiple of p
we can rewrite the sieve
function as
._________________________________________________
| |
| sieve input = |
| .___________________________ |
| | | |
<--------- head input : | sieve (transform input ) | |
| | | |
| \===========================+ |
| |
\=================================================+
In imperative pseudocode, we could write it as
sieve input =
while (True) :
emit (head input)
input := transform input
This pattern of repeated applications is known as iteration:
iterate f x = loop x
where
loop x = x : loop (f x) -- [x, f x, f (f x), f (f (f x)), ...]
So that
sieve xs = map head ( iterate transform xs )
Naturally, head element of each transformed sequence on each step will be a prime, since we've removed all the multiples of the preceding primes on previous steps.
Haskell is lazy, so transformations won't be done in full on each step, far from it - only as much will be done as needed. That means producing only the first element, and "making a notice" to perform the transformation further when asked:
<---- 2 --- [2..]
<---- 3 --- [3..] >>= noMult 2
<---- 5 --- ([4..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3
<---- 7 --- (([6..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3) >>= noMult 5
((([8..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3) >>= noMult 5) >>= noMult 7
.......
Incidentally, this should give us an idea: 3 needn't really be tested by 2; 4..8 needn't really be tested by 3, let alone 5 or 7; 9..24 shouldn't really be tested by 5; etc. What we want is the following:
<---- 2,3 --- [2..]
<---- 5,7 --- [4..] >>= noMult 2
<---- 11,...,23 --- ([9..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3
<---- 29,...,47 --- (([25..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3) >>= noMult 5
((([49..] >>= noMult 2) >>= noMult 3) >>= noMult 5)
....... >>= noMult 7
i.e. we want the creation of each >>= noMult p
filter postponed until p*p
is reached in the input.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27198061/prime-number-generator-with-recursion-and-list-comprehension